[gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Leandro Melo de Sales]

Hi list,

  few years later I setup a environment which shares the /home using
NFS for the users and the authentication method was NIS. Is this still
the best solution?
  My current environment is based on LDAP where all services use it. I
configured PAM+NSSwitch, Postfix, and so on. Now, I want linux client
workstations be authenticated remotely on my LDAP server and mount the
users home. What do you recommend?

Thanks,

Leandro.

-- 
Leandro Melo de Sales.
Computer Science MSc Candidate
Distributed System Lab - lsd.ufcg.edu.br
Pervasive Computing Lab - embedded.ufcg.edu.br
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Donnie Berkholz]

Leandro Melo de Sales wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
>  few years later I setup a environment which shares the /home using
> NFS for the users and the authentication method was NIS. Is this still
> the best solution?
>  My current environment is based on LDAP where all services use it. I
> configured PAM+NSSwitch, Postfix, and so on. Now, I want linux client
> workstations be authenticated remotely on my LDAP server and mount the
> users home. What do you recommend?

You can use LDAP + pam_ldap for auth, I think there's a guide on gentoo.org.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Leandro Melo de Sales]

OK. And about NFS? Is still the best one for file share proposes? What
about CIFS?

[]s
Leandro

2006/8/11, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>:
> Leandro Melo de Sales wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> >  few years later I setup a environment which shares the /home using
> > NFS for the users and the authentication method was NIS. Is this still
> > the best solution?
> >  My current environment is based on LDAP where all services use it. I
> > configured PAM+NSSwitch, Postfix, and so on. Now, I want linux client
> > workstations be authenticated remotely on my LDAP server and mount the
> > users home. What do you recommend?
>
> You can use LDAP + pam_ldap for auth, I think there's a guide on gentoo.org.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Donnie Berkholz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 261 bytes --]

Leandro Melo de Sales wrote:
> OK. And about NFS? Is still the best one for file share proposes? What
> about CIFS?

NFSv3 over TCP is pretty solid, but if you're in a mixed Windows-Linux
environment you might want to look into CIFS.

Thanks,
Donnie


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[reader]

Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> writes:

> Leandro Melo de Sales wrote:
>> OK. And about NFS? Is still the best one for file share proposes? What
>> about CIFS?
>
> NFSv3 over TCP is pretty solid, but if you're in a mixed Windows-Linux
> environment you might want to look into CIFS.

But when the direction is windows => linux.  How does cifs come into play?

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Anno v. Heimburg]

reader@newsguy.com wrote:
> But when the direction is windows => linux.  How does cifs come into play?

I don't quite get your question. CIFS/SMB is what Windows uses for its
network shares. Using samba, Linux can both share and mount* CIFS volumes.

Anno

*) For mounting, you have to also compile SMB support into the kernel.





-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[reader]

"Anno v. Heimburg" <anno@vonheimburg.de> writes:

> reader@newsguy.com wrote:
>> But when the direction is windows => linux.  How does cifs come into play?
>
> I don't quite get your question. CIFS/SMB is what Windows uses for its
> network shares. Using samba, Linux can both share and mount* CIFS volumes.

Oh sorry I was laboring under the notion smb disn not include cifs.
My mistake.


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Sven Köhler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 503 bytes --]

>  few years later I setup a environment which shares the /home using
> NFS for the users and the authentication method was NIS. Is this still
> the best solution?
>  My current environment is based on LDAP where all services use it. I
> configured PAM+NSSwitch, Postfix, and so on. Now, I want linux client
> workstations be authenticated remotely on my LDAP server and mount the
> users home. What do you recommend?

My university uses LDAP + AFS.

AFS seems quite complicated though ...


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 251 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Dirk Heinrichs]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 802 bytes --]

Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2006 23:36 schrieb ext Leandro Melo de Sales:
> Hi list,
>
>   few years later I setup a environment which shares the /home using
> NFS for the users and the authentication method was NIS. Is this still
> the best solution?

It never was. It was the _only_ one for some time.

Depending on the size of your network, I would look into OpenAFS, Kerberos 
and LDAP for file, authorization and authentication services.

Bye...

	Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs          | Tel:  +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager   | Fax:  +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland   | Mail: dirk.heinrichs@capgemini.com
Hambornerstraße 55      | Web:  http://www.capgemini.com
D-40472 Düsseldorf      | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS?

[Meino Christian Cramer]

Hi,

 from time to time when shutdown is nearly complete (right before the
 system's power goes down) udev spits a lot of messages onto the
 console.

 It way to fast to notice anything. I recognized only, that udev is
 the one with the "famous last words".

 I checked the file below /var/log for anything useful, but founnd
 nothing. 

 Does anyone have any idea, what is triggering this "cry of the udev"
 and what is going wrong there ?

 Thank you very much for any help in advance!

 Keep hacking!
 mcc
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list