From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8WPX-0007Fw-4i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 06:10:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7368GiV012696; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 06:08:16 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7366KUu023564 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 06:06:20 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 30965375A3; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:08:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.077,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr1 (2006-06-01) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.82.196 rdns=mue-88-130-82-196.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.244! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=5899135999 auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 12; hammy, 102; neutral, 57; spammy, 2., Hammy=0.000-+--schrieb, 0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*f:sk:7573e96, Spammy=0.897-+--visit, 0.896-+--H*r:sk:hetzner X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3-gr1 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "_DCCB_", Result _DCCR_ - Pyzor=_PYZOR_, RBL _RBL_ Received: from [192.168.1.244] (mue-88-130-82-196.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.82.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5899135999 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:08:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44D19240.5030903@mid.email-server.info> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:05:52 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What is the release date for 2006.1? References: <200608020054.58779.germanobax@yahoo.com.br> <200608021740.38576.germanobax@yahoo.com.br> <7573e9640608021438i799c7d6euc416023c92d964e2@mail.gmail.com> <20060803000928.GA6200@jfindlay.us> <7573e9640608021740i56bd4c26j9256b08cba152159@mail.gmail.com> <20060803035502.GB6200@jfindlay.us> In-Reply-To: <20060803035502.GB6200@jfindlay.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fdf5ff12-8d72-4536-bc90-d0b6bb324971 X-Archives-Hash: 706a51ff8ef8912ab3d15a29513c7feb Justin R Findlay schrieb: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:40:17PM -0700, Richard Fish wrote: >> Well the main reason is because profiles will disappear from portage >> after a certain amount of time, and you can't really run without a >> profile!! > > Right, but I still don't understand why it doesn't auto update when it's > "ready", Why should it? If I set the profile to $whatever, I've got my reasons to do so. > because for people like me who rarely visit the gentoo main > page I'm not going to know about a new profile unless I manually look > around in /usr/portage/profiles. And because of lazy people, other people have to suffer? I don't think that this is the right way to go. Alexander Skwar -- Spock: We suffered 23 casualties in that attack, Captain. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list