From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G4MCe-0004Mj-0R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:27:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6MIQ144021717; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:26:01 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6MIHw0C031913 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:17:58 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 30CE335BE1; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:19:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.070,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr1 (2006-06-01) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.94.116 rdns=mue-88-130-94-116.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.244! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=B8A0F35758 auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 25; hammy, 118; neutral, 71; spammy, 2., Hammy=0.000-+--schrieb, 0.000-+--sbin, 0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--imap, 0.000-+--Portage, Spammy=0.896-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.864-+--wish X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3-gr1 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "_DCCB_", Result _DCCR_ - Pyzor=_PYZOR_, RBL [213.133.109.44] [10 new.email-server.info.] Received: from [192.168.1.244] (mue-88-130-94-116.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.94.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A0F35758 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:19:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44C26BCA.1020008@mid.email-server.info> Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:17:46 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE_ELOG error References: <49bf44f10607220921r614c9650v33f73c25ebb59d3c@mail.gmail.com> <44C25502.5020804@mid.email-server.info> <49bf44f10607221007r522789q6921abeb7ca3f7d0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10607221007r522789q6921abeb7ca3f7d0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ba54a5b4-8b62-4d9b-82fc-90b04e1808d0 X-Archives-Hash: 0e53c0a8c0ca4f75e09aad28218421bf Grant schrieb: >> If you wish to use ssmtp with ELOG, you've got to use PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM=custom >> and set up your own program in PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND. Read my howto at >> http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Making_portage_use_/usr/sbin/sendmail_to_send_out_ELOG_mails > That looks pretty slick but I try to do things as Gentoo as possible. Me too - but what's "un-Gentoo" about using PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND? > Any chance of your functionality getting integrated into Portage? I don't know, but it would be a very useful addition - and IMO, they could dump that useless feature, that portage can do SMTP by itself. That's so un-Unix, so Windows-like :( > Also, in place of ssmtp, would postfix alone do the trick Yes, it would, but I'd actually not suggest to do so. Installing postfix (or any SMTP server, for that matter) just for Portage isn't the right way to go. It's too much code, opening too many potential problems, which can be sidestepped by making portage use /usr/sbin/sendmail instead. > or would I > need something like courier-imap too? IMAP has nothing to do with that. IMAP is for a client to fetch mails (kind of). It's not for sending mails. Alexander Skwar -- Gruuk: UFies are above and beyond the human race :) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list