From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G3brB-0008FC-U6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:58:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6KGuWQR026970; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:56:32 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6KGlVk5017592 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:47:33 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EE6953564E; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:50:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.070,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr1 (2006-06-01) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.75.12 rdns=mue-88-130-75-012.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.244! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=B1F413564A auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 27; hammy, 110; neutral, 41; spammy, 6., Hammy=0.000-+--schrieb, 0.000-+--gcc, 0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:mue-88-, Spammy=0.985-3--eve, 0.978-2--principal, 0.923-2--4th, 0.896-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.877-+--outstanding X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3-gr1 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "_DCCB_", Result _DCCR_ - Pyzor=_PYZOR_, RBL _RBL_ Received: from [192.168.1.244] (mue-88-130-75-012.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.75.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F413564A for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:50:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44BFB396.1090506@mid.email-server.info> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:47:18 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1 , question on recompiling References: <20060719105701.59255.qmail@web61014.mail.yahoo.com> <44BE25EA.8080100@mid.message-center.info> <20060719130524.GC4804@sympatico.ca> <44BE34D0.3050702@mid.message-center.info> <20060719152204.1fe10835@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20060720000613.GA4807@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060720000613.GA4807@sympatico.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 520c5ca4-66d3-437a-a68a-cb824db24ef0 X-Archives-Hash: 2b80c0378ecc618aa83acb89d24f4839 Philip Webb schrieb: > A lot of outstanding bugs seem to affect only a few special users. Like those, using KDE. But I wouldn't say, that those a just a "few". > Yet again, Gentoo should make a 4th category by making "stable" = "server" > & splitting "testing" into "newly unmasked" & "desktop-ready": Why? ~ is testing. The only problem I had, which caused me to start the short thread, was, that the gcc upgrade doc *used to* say, that upgrading from gcc 3.4.x to 4.1.x implied no risk. > many "testing" packages today are in fact desktop-ready, > ie the remaining bugs will be rare & easy to recover from. Yep, quite easy to recover - recompile everything. Alexander Skwar -- Adam and Eve had many advantages, but the principal one was, that they escaped teething. -- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar" -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list