From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G0rPe-0007w2-7N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 02:58:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6D2uKSF000317; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 02:56:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6D2l4K8012061 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 02:47:05 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.106] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398D6643EB for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 02:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44B5B420.5050300@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:46:56 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060604) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Font missing after xorg upgrade References: <200607121215.33671.bulliver@badcomputer.org> <44B55511.7040105@gentoo.org> <200607121430.55536.bulliver@badcomputer.org> <44B56E93.1020800@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig90FB04E5C0042D1170A934C5" X-Archives-Salt: 0602b573-dff6-4cd5-8581-b87a1ee83f19 X-Archives-Hash: 9034aa5ca067b7b5737fe96140335ac3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig90FB04E5C0042D1170A934C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Allan Gottlieb wrote: > I notice that some of the fonts you mention are keyword masked (at > least on x86). For example font-bitstream-* (except for -vera) and > font-ibm-type1. Are these fonts less tested? Would you recommend > unmasking all of them? Would you want me to file a bug asking for > stabilization? I should add that I am not at all hurting with just > the (stable) fonts that I do have installed. I've mentioned this elsewhere, but the idea is that we're trying to figure out which programs, fonts, etc people really use and need. If you actually use something (not just install it and never use the fonts or whatever), please file a bug requesting that it be stabled. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig90FB04E5C0042D1170A934C5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEtbQhXVaO67S1rtsRAgn6AJ9J38kfLEh32sWxwRJx68vtDLY+KwCgktcV XqLHZYKJiYmqHu4N7Zcdm28= =atis -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig90FB04E5C0042D1170A934C5-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list