Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Marco Calviani <marco.calviani@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>    i've recently read this short article on distrowatch:
>>
>> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060626#news
>>
>> What about these problems? Someone that's more inside the Gentoo
>> decision process, can explain better what's (if it is true) happening?
>>
> 
> Well, the guy got the attention he wanted.
> If you follow GWN, you can see devs that come to the project, and
> others leave, that's only natural, and if you leave a project, you
> simply do not post the entire web with reasons that can only be taken
> as highly personal and regarding the human relations inside Gentoo
> Project. Why aren't the other developers answering? I have only one
> guess... They really don't care... The project is going on and see
> lots of discussions and improvements at all topics on the mailing
> lists and foruns. Gentoo is not dying, not even loosing strenght. Its
> growing, and growing is painfull, we all know that.
> 
> Now, distrowatch should pay more attention before posting news that
> can lead to misunderstanding, probably the dev that left the project
> had better relations inside distrowatch than inside Gentoo development
> project ;)
> 
Hi,
Don't wanna say anything, but all of you could just search -dev
ML-archives. There are two alternate package-managers in development.
Some sparks about dev/user overlays,sunrise-overlay,GWN etc. etc.
Not seen such turmoil in latest 3 years (and IMHO most things are
personal). No flames intended, just info.
Rumen