From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fw6hk-0004bz-PB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:17:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5U0GEuk023549; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:16:14 GMT Received: from exeter.monstertech.ca (zz194029.cipherkey.net [209.53.194.29]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5U0Av1j005256 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:10:58 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.101] (s209-121-198-101.bc.hsia.telus.net [209.121.198.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by exeter.monstertech.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5U0Aq3I019272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:10:53 -0700 Message-ID: <44A46C0C.40702@monstertech.ca> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:10:52 -0700 From: Darren Grant User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading from gcc-3.4.5 to gcc-3.4.6-r1 References: <44A17B4B.5010605@monstertech.ca> <200606282018.04837.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> <44A2D01A.5020104@monstertech.ca> <200606282111.05620.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> <44A2E9E0.3000708@monstertech.ca> <44A2F4F5.4050100@monstertech.ca> <7573e9640606291119n3c36f3e6xb49ae553a6c056a0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7573e9640606291119n3c36f3e6xb49ae553a6c056a0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: eab20833-3d75-474a-89b5-f09603aa22ac X-Archives-Hash: c465b6c46354448a370952240cd25d88 Richard Fish wrote: > On 6/28/06, Darren Grant wrote: >> Any chance that's what's causing my gcc problems now? > > Hmm, I doubt it. But in comparing what you have posted to my AMD64 > box, I see some things that don't look right. For example, on my > AMD64 box, I have: > > Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0 > Portage 2.1 (default-linux/amd64/2006.0, gcc-4.1.1/amd64-vanilla, > glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.16 x86_64) > ================================================================= > System uname: 2.6.16 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor > 4400+ > > Notice my profile is default-linux/amd64/, where you have > your profile as just default-linux/amd64. I'm not sure that is > actually supported...and may in fact be the cause of your trouble. > > The new profiles (starting with 2005.1) are "multilib" by default, so > for example merging glibc will try to build both i686 and x86_64 > versions. So it is in fact perfectly reasonble for an emerge of glibc > to try to build a i686 version, but *only* if you are using a multilib > profile. Similarly gcc would try to build i686 versions of its > libraries, but would require an i686 glibc to be available first. > > I suspect what you need to do is: > > cd /etc > rm make.profile > ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2005.1/no-multilib > > Then try re-merging glibc and gcc. > > If you want to switch to the multilib profile, the symlink should be > to /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2005.1 or 2006.0. But > you might want to ask on gentoo-amd64 about how to switch from > no-multilib to a multilib profile... > > -Richard Didn't seem to help... I can emerge certain packages, but still can't re-merge gcc and glibc. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list