From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fw22S-000401-Gm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:18:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5TJGpG5017682; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:51 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5TJ6GGC029765 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:06:16 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1C32931AF6; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:07:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.068,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr0 (2006-06-01) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.72.6 rdns=mue-88-130-72-006.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.244! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=49AB630B6A auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 72; neutral, 34; spammy, 3., Hammy=0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--vanilla, 0.000-+--H*p:U*listen, Spammy=0.988-+--scientists, 0.898-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.864-+--wish X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3-gr0 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "_DCCB_", Result _DCCR_ - Pyzor=_PYZOR_, RBL [213.133.109.44] Received: from [192.168.1.244] (mue-88-130-72-006.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.72.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AB630B6A for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:07:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44A424A0.1020708@mid.email-server.info> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:06:08 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060610) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: What's going to break, if vanilla kernel is used? References: <44A42461.6050305@mid.email-server.info> In-Reply-To: <44A42461.6050305@mid.email-server.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 68193ac9-7da2-416d-99c1-a21d0fbd6ed5 X-Archives-Hash: f14c8ae4366b31e836ae012279d2e101 Alexander Skwar wrote: > [ nothing for this list ] Whoops... Sorry, wrong list. Please disregard the previous message - sometimes I wish, there were a "Cancel" feature for mails as well... Alexander Skwar -- This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough hunchbacks. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list