From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fw20Z-0001cX-EC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5TJDQ8o015231; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:13:26 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5TJ5E69007083 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:05:14 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 64FBC31AE5; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:06:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.068,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr0 (2006-06-01) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.72.6 rdns=mue-88-130-72-006.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.244! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=06C6130B6A auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 84; neutral, 43; spammy, 4., Hammy=0.000-+--ubuntu, 0.000-+--Ubuntu, 0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--Dapper, 0.000-+--H*MI:mid, Spammy=0.917-+--shipped, 0.898-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.896-+--H*MI:server, 0.873-+--H*MI:info X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3-gr0 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "_DCCB_", Result _DCCR_ - Pyzor=_PYZOR_, RBL [213.133.109.44] Received: from [192.168.1.244] (mue-88-130-72-006.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.72.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C6130B6A for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44A42461.6050305@mid.email-server.info> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:05:05 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060610) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] What's going to break, if vanilla kernel is used? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b24a184b-8c7a-4881-bbcf-7ca68643f4e5 X-Archives-Hash: 5373c3345db883c78fbb0f184f2a31d5 Hello! As suspend/resume doesn't work with the kernel shipped with Dapper, I'd like to try using the suspend2 kernel patch from . But the patch cannot be applied cleanly against the Ubuntu sources. Because of that, I'd like to use a vanilla kernel. But the Ubuntu patches are there for a reason, I'd suppose. Is this reason documented somewhere? Or, put differently, what do the Ubuntu patches add to the vanilla kernel and what's not going to work anymore after using a vanilla kernel? Thanks, Alexander Skwar -- You can always pick up your needle and move to another groove. -- Tim Leary -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list