From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fvgpg-0005rp-7l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:40:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5SKd3bG029298; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:39:03 GMT Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5SKTx17010215 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:30:00 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([72.71.198.236]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J1L00HDL7KMWZS9@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:29:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:29:11 -0400 From: sean Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag In-reply-to: <20060628065850.GA30894@princeton.edu> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <44A2E697.1050302@verizon.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <44A1ED13.9010100@verizon.net> <20060628032847.GB26729@princeton.edu> <44A21AFA.30900@sarai.net> <20060628065850.GA30894@princeton.edu> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060628) X-Archives-Salt: 32c35ef1-164a-409e-95b1-86eb23fa1d27 X-Archives-Hash: 90392b9ef5ad37cbebaa220030aad1b2 Willie Wong wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:30:26AM +0530, Penguin Lover Aniruddha Shankar squawked: >> Willie Wong wrote: >>> Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. >> I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display >> interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk) >> > > I've tried both, and I didn't really find much difference between the > tools. Care to elucidate on why profuse is better? (Or do you mean > that it is better because it supports multiple display interfaces?) > [I am not trying to start a flamewar. If there is some feature of > profuse that I didn't know about that is useful and not present for > ufed, I'd like to find out.] > > I think I ended up using ufed because it got support for the -* flag > first. > > W They both like interesting, I did see some screen shots of profuse, does ufed operate the same? Thanks Sean -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list