From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FuvRs-00085b-Fx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:04:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5QHx7GG003493; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:59:07 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5QHZqZ3029466 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:35:52 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 21C8E311B4; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:37:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.070,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3-gr0 (2006-06-01) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.78.103 rdns=mue-88-130-78-103.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.244! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=8253B311B8 auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 86; neutral, 34; spammy, 3., Hammy=0.000-+--diff, 0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*p:U*listen, Spammy=0.978-2--pockets, 0.898-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.861-+--watch X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3-gr0 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "_DCCB_", Result _DCCR_ - Pyzor=_PYZOR_, RBL _RBL_ Received: from [192.168.1.244] (mue-88-130-78-103.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.78.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8253B311B8 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44A01AED.2070903@mid.email-server.info> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:35:41 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060610) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] etc-update References: <449FD4B2.2080408@verizon.net> <200606261453.45927.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 704f7f90-51b0-4aba-a1c6-aca1587ec4db X-Archives-Hash: d145e7fc6dab0f30b44383606f039025 A. Khattri wrote: > For example, looking at diffs using vim via etc-update is easier to read > than dispatch-conf. The fact that dispatch-conf can use archiving is nice > but it uses the (archaic) rcs tool to do it. > > For me, seeing the diffs clearly is more important... ACK But dispatch-conf uses diff as well, so that's no advantage of etc-update over dispatch-conf. Alexander Skwar -- A consultant is a person who borrows your watch, tells you what time it is, pockets the watch, and sends you a bill for it. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list