From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ft6TV-00036J-Vh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:26:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5LHPTCx001566; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:25:29 GMT Received: from popmail.jettissystems.com (popmail.jettissystems.com [38.118.146.212]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5LHKVuj012962 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:20:32 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.101] (c-67-188-110-125.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [67.188.110.125]) by popmail.jettissystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269E456D487 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44997FE0.4040809@badapple.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:20:32 -0700 From: kashani User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] where's good old inetd ? References: <20060621121833.GA1571@nibiru.local> <20060621145318.GB8517@nibiru.local> In-Reply-To: <20060621145318.GB8517@nibiru.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4bd415e9-5588-401c-b363-5af8d317c4fb X-Archives-Hash: 6cec595c32b85438aebecbce5d0fefdc Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Bruno Lustosa wrote: > > > >> anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure! > > well, I've already been using it for over 10 years, I never had > serious problems with it, and has all I need. > So why should I now switch to xinetd ? Because most of us switched to xinetd at least six years ago. :-) kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list