From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FsLHZ-0006jG-Tv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:03:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5JF1FK1030356; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:01:15 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5JEsm4B013883 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:54:48 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3C1C92FED0; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:58:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.083,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1-gr0 (2006-03-10) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.121.46 rdns=mue-88-130-121-046.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.244! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=8DEAF2FE93 auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 26; hammy, 93; neutral, 61; spammy, 2., Hammy=0.000-+--sbin, 0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--glibc, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:mue-88-, Spammy=0.899-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.891-1--pushed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1-gr0 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "", Result - Pyzor=, RBL [213.133.109.44] Received: from [192.168.1.244] (mue-88-130-121-046.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.121.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEAF2FE93 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:58:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4496BAF3.7060509@mid.email-server.info> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:55:47 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060610) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Lost most locales after glibc upgrade References: <44968870.1090808@infoline.su> <449697CC.7070209@mid.message-center.info> <5cd9791d0606190720oac51e1as99548b74ecc86545@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5cd9791d0606190720oac51e1as99548b74ecc86545@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d932bf7c-42d8-41c9-b4bd-b45a7405876a X-Archives-Hash: add54eb54ca3ad325a8f61ea5a86abc6 fei huang wrote: > > > On 6/19/06, *Alexander Skwar* > wrote: > > Alexander Kirillov wrote: > > > I've lost most of them locales after upgrade to glibc-2.3.6-r4. > > You'll need to create a /etc/locale.gen file. After that, read > > man 5 locale.gen > man 8 locale-gen > > and run /usr/sbin/locale-gen > > > I don't have userlocales flag set either. > > As there *is* no such flag, there's really no need to set it. > > > there IS a userlocales flag available for the previous version, So, there IS no such flag available for the current version, ie. the version, the OP is about. > seems > not working though, Worked very well, when there used to be such a flag. At least on my systems it worked very well. > I set the USE flag, but locale -a still list nearly > everything. Did you create a /etc/locales.build file? > the latest r4 version ignore this flag somehow. Yes, as I said: There IS no such flag as "userlocales". But you're right, this flag is ignored - just like other non-existant flags. Anyway, the solution is to create a /etc/locale.gen file and run locale-gen. Alexander Skwar -- Would it help if I got out and pushed? -- Princess Leia Organa -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list