From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PCI video cards, hardware accel, upported by open-source drivers?
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:21:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4478837.7iGdGDpy0a@energy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120415131815.GA21028@waltdnes.org>
Am Sonntag, 15. April 2012, 09:18:15 schrieb Walter Dnes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:30:02PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 02:11:35 schrieb Walter Dnes:
> > > If it's PCIe, so be it. Actually, a post that prevents me wasting
> > >
> > > money is helpful <G>. Would PCIe be significantly better on the same
> > > CPU+GPU, or is it hype?
> >
> > a lot, lot lot lot better. No hype.
>
> I've done some looking, and I'm back with more questions. I've also
> read the Nouveau-versus-NVIDIA thread. Questions...
>
> 1) Will PCIe 2.0 cards work in a PCIe 1.0 slot?
yes
>
> 2) My main "torture test" will be HD fullscreen video. Will there be
> major improvement in that? That's 2D. Forget 3D.
>
if you get va-api working. Is it mpeg4?
> 3) The 2 lowest-priced Nvidia's at the local store are...
>
> Asus EN210 SILENT/DI/512MD3/V2(LP) NVIDIA GeForce 210 Chipset (589Mhz)
> 512MB (1333Mhz) GDDR3 DVI/VGA/HDMI PCI-Express 2.0 Graphics Card
>
you could also stay with onboard graphics.
>
> and EVGA GeForce 8400GS 1GB (01G-P3-1302-LR) nVidia GeForce 8400GS
> Chipset (520Mhz) 1GB (520Mhz) DDR3 Dual Display DVI/HDMI/VGA PCI Express
> 2.0 Graphics Card
you should stay with onboard graphics.
>
> Any preferences?
yes, AMD, they support open source.
also, va-api does work.
--
#163933
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-15 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 11:26 [gentoo-user] PCI video cards, hardware accel, upported by open-source drivers? Walter Dnes
2012-04-10 11:47 ` Dale
2012-04-10 14:08 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2012-04-10 14:19 ` Michael Mol
2012-04-10 18:08 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-04-10 17:45 ` [gentoo-user] " Stroller
2012-04-11 6:11 ` Walter Dnes
2012-04-11 6:39 ` Paul Hartman
2012-04-11 6:51 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-04-11 16:33 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-04-11 18:06 ` Florian Philipp
2012-04-11 19:37 ` Stroller
2012-04-11 16:30 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-04-11 16:45 ` Michael Mol
2012-04-15 13:18 ` Walter Dnes
2012-04-15 14:05 ` Drew
2012-04-15 14:09 ` Florian Philipp
2012-04-15 14:22 ` Michael Mol
2012-04-15 14:44 ` Florian Philipp
2012-04-15 20:45 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-04-15 20:54 ` Michael Mol
2012-04-15 21:42 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-04-17 14:11 ` Claudio Roberto França Pereira
2012-04-17 14:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2012-04-15 14:21 ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4478837.7iGdGDpy0a@energy \
--to=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox