From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FjsCS-0001vf-R8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 May 2006 06:23:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4R6Lc0E023309; Sat, 27 May 2006 06:21:38 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4R6FlQE027283 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 06:15:47 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7A3D72D0EE; Sat, 27 May 2006 08:16:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.093,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1-gr0 (2006-03-10) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.96.247 rdns=mue-88-130-96-247.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.12! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=21F722D0E9 auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 6; hammy, 86; neutral, 43; spammy, 4., Hammy=0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-+--Portage, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-+--H*r:ip*192.168.1.12, Spammy=0.945-+--dreams, 0.907-+--compared, 0.900-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.850-+--future X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1-gr0 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "", Result - Pyzor=, RBL [213.133.109.44] [10 new.email-server.info.] Received: from [192.168.1.12] (mue-88-130-96-247.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.96.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F722D0E9 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 08:16:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4477EEA2.4060108@mid.email-server.info> Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 08:16:02 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060509) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow References: <200605262104.50835.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <447756DD.1070001@mid.email-server.info> <200605270025.53855.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: <200605270025.53855.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k4R6Lc0W023309 X-Archives-Salt: 8e7d2904-7986-43d2-a309-a543c832a9a3 X-Archives-Hash: 1da8265e9618c4dca9490d9b43848063 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Friday 26 May 2006 21:28, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: >> > On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo =D8rsted Andresen wrote: >> >> Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin: >> >> > ok, but still less to type ;) >> >> >> >> But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;) >> > >> > I am using search less, than syncing, so still a win, and it is only >> > esea ;) >> >> Which is still 5 characters compared to 3 characters for eix :) >> > but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;) Nah, it's 5 to 5, so eix-sync is NOT longer than esync... eix- So, at best, eix is as bad as esearch, but normally eix is faster to use - in every aspect. Alexander Skwar --=20 "May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list