From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fj0zH-0006dg-NA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 21:33:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4OLWZSQ028494; Wed, 24 May 2006 21:32:35 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4OLNl8H031316 for ; Wed, 24 May 2006 21:23:47 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so1823187ugd for ; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:23:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=n7gW1pZexQOW3UAgG1w+/0RRWUlOmp5QxZ/1k1S0LQGEltYLns14aGH9cUJE8IvJVTi49YMAEJN/DF9MyBwf+TITtwe2jHvmm8WmJs6xTNB0UDRCMDh0kN3zOnLUyd80y8t/lt7Umh/HHoHif9YXQ+bRYgyF+8vLU0EUVZuod+Y= Received: by 10.66.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr6043171uge; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.10.4? ( [84.168.225.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id s1sm7761805uge.2006.05.24.14.23.47; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4474EB42.3030900@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:24:50 +0000 From: Alex User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060520) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] content of /usr/portage/distfile References: <20060524142643.5710.qmail@web27406.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <169ffc030605240752s39bfb543r9988c1d1d4e9c267@mail.gmail.com> <4474C785.3040203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 553770a4-c3e0-4128-8a5b-55109bcdf861 X-Archives-Hash: a9959f72488c3be2ecf0d5693b12104c Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Often the bigger problem with large binaries is that their working > sets exceeds the sizes of the L1 and (possibly) L2 caches. Well, I'm using -O3 and I have 1Mb L2, do you think I should "migrate" to -Os? Richard Fish wrote: > the real deciding factor was that it took a lot less > time to compile with -Os compared to -O3. The time I need to compile isn't my problem, and if it would, I think I could easy use -O0 ;) BTW, is gcc 4.1 faster than 3.4? I've some benchmarks about gcc4, but not compared with 3.4. Alex -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list