From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FbuFk-0001lC-Lt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 May 2006 06:57:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k456ruqK026672; Fri, 5 May 2006 06:53:56 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k456WLiE007890 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 06:32:21 GMT Received: by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CFF172ABFD; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:34:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL=0.120,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Contact: Contact Address X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1-gr0 (2006-03-10) on hetzner.email-server.info X-Spam-Relays: Trusted=, Untrusted=[ ip=88.130.75.85 rdns=mue-88-130-75-085.dsl.tropolys.de helo=!192.168.1.12! by=hetzner.email-server.info ident= envfrom= intl=0 id=101332AC3D auth= ] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: Score=0.0000, Tokens=Tokens: new, 25; hammy, 118; neutral, 61; spammy, 4., Hammy=0.000-+--H*f:sk:Pine.LN, 0.000-+--sk:package, 0.000-+--H*M:mid, 0.000-6--H*r:sk:mue-88-, 0.000-6--H*RU:sk:mue-88-, Spammy=0.985-+--tabs, 0.940-+--HAVE, 0.901-+--H*r:sk:hetzner, 0.874-+--scroll X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1-gr0 X-Spam-Externals: DCC Brand "", Result - Pyzor=, RBL Received: from [192.168.1.12] (mue-88-130-75-085.dsl.tropolys.de [88.130.75.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101332AC3D for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:33:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <445AF1B2.4010404@mid.email-server.info> Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 08:33:22 +0200 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060430) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow? References: <7797aa370604300524i6b8616ebr947b762fec45f92a@mail.gmail.com> <200605032221.27730.lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200605032221.27730.lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k456ruqc026672 X-Archives-Salt: 8fb59168-6538-4206-981b-d77cc1a900aa X-Archives-Hash: 3d9e0fd4a3a7f69d29bb59af5efaee16 lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 06:05 am, Tero Grundstr=F6m wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, wu chuanwen wrote: >> > Hi! Everybody! >> > I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow= ?In >> > my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be st= uck >> > and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situati= on.Do >> > you think so? And how can you solve this problem? >> >> Well, I recently switched to the binary version and to my surprise I >> found that it is much faster than the self compiled version. Especiall= y >> the interface is much more responsive in the binary version. I don't k= now >> how it could be. Makes me really wonder where else I'm loosing speed o= n >> Gentoo... >=20 > How did you "switch to a binary version?" Person, why are you asking all those questions? Why don't you simply *think*, hm? As you HAVE TO know, there's a -bin version of mozilla-firefox. You DO KNOW, because http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=3Dmozilla-firefox shows you. > How did you do that? With emerge. > I didn't know=20 > you could use emerge and not compile it. Too bad for you. Alexander Skwar --=20 BOFH Excuse #141: disks spinning backwards - toggle the hemisphere jumper. --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list