* [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work?
@ 2006-04-15 23:32 Rohit and Bhavana
2006-04-16 2:55 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rohit and Bhavana @ 2006-04-15 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
Is there anyone on the list who has the following configured on their
workstations?
* bootsplash giving them a nice picture at the startup [ in runlevel
boot]
* bootsplash giving them a nice picture later [ in runlevel default]
* Then X11 starting on their nvidia card configured with xf86 or
xorg with X working in default runlevel
* Switching back to consol with control-alt-F[n] and being able to
work without locking up your box - and without framebuffer corruption.
What I want to do is have my virtual consoles [alt-F1 through to alt-FN
except for F7 of course] having individual pretty images on each of
them, and X windows working at the same time.
Is it even possible?
If yes, then if you know anyone has everything working, I would be
obliged to note the version numbers etc and any pointers.
I have looked at the net [I must admit, not in the last two weeks
though] and was baffled by the following.
- framebuffer corruption just wouldn't go away.
- machine lockups
- many a times, no errors but the framebuffer image still wouldn't show
up at the startup
- not being clear about difference between gensplash and bootsplash
[they seem to serve the same purpose] which one should I use on my
system. Should I emerge one, or both or one of them and themes for both?
[You can tell how confused I am].
I know this is long - so if you can take some patient time out for me, I
would be very grateful. Else I could use any pointers/links given by you
on my own time.
Time to rebuild my box is close anyway - need to repartition whole thing
to make more room for Oracle/Gentoo and MySQL/Gentoo.
Best regards,
Rohit
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work?
2006-04-15 23:32 [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work? Rohit and Bhavana
@ 2006-04-16 2:55 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-16 6:50 ` Rohit Sharma
2006-04-16 7:02 ` lordsauronthegreat
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-04-16 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 4/15/06, Rohit and Bhavana <bhavhit@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there anyone on the list who has the following configured on their
> workstations?
>
> * bootsplash giving them a nice picture at the startup [ in runlevel
> boot]
> * bootsplash giving them a nice picture later [ in runlevel default]
> * Then X11 starting on their nvidia card configured with xf86 or
> xorg with X working in default runlevel
> * Switching back to consol with control-alt-F[n] and being able to
> work without locking up your box - and without framebuffer corruption.
I have all of this working on my Dell e1705 laptop. Significant details:
2.6.15-suspend2-r8
[ebuild R ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 0 kB
[ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r3 USE="dri -debug -ipv6
-minimal -xprint" 0 kB
Also I use the vesafb-tng framebuffer driver.
> If yes, then if you know anyone has everything working, I would be
> obliged to note the version numbers etc and any pointers.
> - not being clear about difference between gensplash and bootsplash
> [they seem to serve the same purpose] which one should I use on my
> system. Should I emerge one, or both or one of them and themes for both?
I would suggest not dealing with bootsplash issues at this point, and
work on getting a stable framebuffer working. Once you have that, the
bootsplash side of things is pretty straight-forward.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work?
2006-04-16 2:55 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-04-16 6:50 ` Rohit Sharma
2006-04-16 17:49 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-16 7:02 ` lordsauronthegreat
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rohit Sharma @ 2006-04-16 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Richard Fish wrote:
>I would suggest not dealing with bootsplash issues at this point, and
>work on getting a stable framebuffer working. Once you have that, the
>bootsplash side of things is pretty straight-forward.
>
>
Thank, Richard - I shall follow you advice. You chose the following I
presume?
- kernel sources [gentoo-sources]
- in kernel config [chose framebuffer-tng]
- X11 served by Xorg
Any tips for me to ensure that my consoles are not corrupted once X
starts and I want command line ob consoles. I think that is what you
meant by stable-framebuffer, didn't you? Please bear with me in case
this has been answered before. Apologies in that case - and I would
really appreciate any pointers.
Thank you so much
Rohit
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work?
2006-04-16 2:55 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-16 6:50 ` Rohit Sharma
@ 2006-04-16 7:02 ` lordsauronthegreat
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: lordsauronthegreat @ 2006-04-16 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3070 bytes --]
On Saturday 15 April 2006 07:55 pm, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 4/15/06, Rohit and Bhavana <bhavhit@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there anyone on the list who has the following configured on their
> > workstations?
> >
> > * bootsplash giving them a nice picture at the startup [ in runlevel
> > boot]
I do that on my laptop. IBM X40 Type 2386-1CU with some weird Intel Extreme
Graphics II chip I've never previously heard of and honestly don't want to
see again (it really sucks - the X40's wonderfully light though, I'd
reccommend it any day! Works perfectly with Linux, too!)
> > * bootsplash giving them a nice picture later [ in runlevel default]
You mean like the livecd-2006.0 theme? Where it has pretty framebuffer
graphics and puts console at 1024x768 (a must-have, IMHO) but then has a
picturized boot process? Yeah, I do that. Then by whacking F2 I can go back
to the verbose process but still with the pretty graphics.
The info you need is in http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash (as reccommended
to me by Bo Andresen).
> > * Then X11 starting on their nvidia card configured with xf86 or
> > xorg with X working in default runlevel
On my server I'm working to get spash working with an nVidia card. The
problems aren't from the nVidia card, however, but rather from Genkernel,
which I find totally inferior to make in every way (why do I need to
recompile the whole kernel every time? I know, I've been spoiled by only
compiling what's changed).
> > * Switching back to consol with control-alt-F[n] and being able to
> > work without locking up your box - and without framebuffer
> > corruption.
Never had a problem here. When I kill X11 and KDM for a console login, it
goes back to the beautified console, but sacrificing no functionality that I
know of.
> I have all of this working on my Dell e1705 laptop. Significant details:
>
> 2.6.15-suspend2-r8
> [ebuild R ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 0 kB
> [ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.2-r3 USE="dri -debug -ipv6
> -minimal -xprint" 0 kB
>
> Also I use the vesafb-tng framebuffer driver.
>
> > If yes, then if you know anyone has everything working, I would be
> > obliged to note the version numbers etc and any pointers.
> >
> > - not being clear about difference between gensplash and bootsplash
> > [they seem to serve the same purpose] which one should I use on my
> > system. Should I emerge one, or both or one of them and themes for both?
I used splashutils with great success. I can't comment about any others
though - I've never tried them.
> I would suggest not dealing with bootsplash issues at this point, and
> work on getting a stable framebuffer working. Once you have that, the
> bootsplash side of things is pretty straight-forward.
I'd reccommend that Wiki. I walked through it and came out alive, and with
linux looking artful enough to shut up all the Windoze zealots that I am
burdened to come into contact with.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work?
2006-04-16 6:50 ` Rohit Sharma
@ 2006-04-16 17:49 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-04-16 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 4/15/06, Rohit Sharma <bhavhit@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> Thank, Richard - I shall follow you advice. You chose the following I
> presume?
> - kernel sources [gentoo-sources]
I'm using suspend2-sources (notice the 'suspend2' in my kernel
version), but gentoo-sources should work also.
Everything else is ok.
>
> Any tips for me to ensure that my consoles are not corrupted once X
> starts and I want command line ob consoles. I think that is what you
> meant by stable-framebuffer, didn't you?
Not really...it should just work. If it doesn't, I guess you could
experiment with different resolutions for the console.
Remember that you can choose the console resolution by changing the
video= option passed to the kernel at boot time (e.g.
video=vesafb:1400x1050-32@60), or with the fbres command (part of
splashutils).
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-17 6:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-15 23:32 [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work? Rohit and Bhavana
2006-04-16 2:55 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-16 6:50 ` Rohit Sharma
2006-04-16 17:49 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-16 7:02 ` lordsauronthegreat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox