From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FSYg1-0008TS-RX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:05:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k39C5Y6l028278; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 12:05:34 GMT Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.169]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k39C0xX3016664 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 12:01:01 GMT Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s2so420882uge for ; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 05:00:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F0TKrUu/S7exuFrVZgDCo+cUFg+jPWOsaZI2uJEelMmQth2QeJrp50yYP5vnKpjq6OtFNAKPI0UpcGwJhMD4j1xZpZmcyMd2kkSlGYHWAGmyegNu4bdV62uPzSF1zrYByCDHBJj3dAhJxJ+2O2gyeFkMtjLLd18YXTdevMZL/4A= Received: by 10.66.248.8 with SMTP id v8mr957166ugh; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 05:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [83.216.44.124]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c1sm672056ugf.2006.04.09.05.00.58; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 05:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4438F779.9010802@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:00:57 +0200 From: Tamas Sarga User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060123) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-kernel References: <44343E15.3020302@gmail.com> <46304.127.0.0.1.1144280871.squirrel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <46304.127.0.0.1.1144280871.squirrel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: da1fa934-c319-4810-af9c-1433e030d724 X-Archives-Hash: c33658ec41a808e7b5e50f7c8be369e0 JimD wrote: > On Wed, April 5, 2006 6:00 pm, Tamas Sarga wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> I had nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 and nvidia-glx-8178. Now the latest >> nvidia-kernel is 8174-r1 with ~x86 keyword. Do anybody knows where >> nvidia-kernel-8178-r3 disappeared, and why. It is simply disappeared >> from the repository, I don't find it in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask. >> >> TIA. >> Tamas Sarga >> > > I just did a sync 1 minute ago and here is what I got: > > total 122K > drwxr-xr-x 3 portage portage 544 Mar 24 17:06 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 170 portage portage 4.5K Apr 5 19:07 ../ > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 35K Mar 24 17:06 ChangeLog > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 21K Mar 24 17:06 Manifest > drwxr-xr-x 10 portage portage 648 Apr 5 19:07 files/ > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 313 Apr 25 2005 metadata.xml > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3.ebuild > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.7K Jan 10 14:59 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5.ebuild > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.9K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1.ebuild > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.2K Jan 24 10:03 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2.ebuild > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.5K Oct 28 03:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667.ebuild > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 4.6K Oct 28 03:19 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1.ebuild > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.5K Dec 7 16:32 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1.ebuild > -rw-r--r-- 1 portage portage 3.6K Mar 24 15:36 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3.ebuild > > Maybe try to sync again? > > Jim > Hi, I synced just now. # ls /usr/portage/media-video/nvidia-kernel/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35048 Apr 8 06:09 ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5901 Apr 8 06:09 Manifest drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Apr 9 12:37 files -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 313 Apr 25 2005 metadata.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4523 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4772 Jan 10 20:59 nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3982 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4277 Jan 24 16:03 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4538 Oct 28 09:35 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4669 Oct 28 09:19 nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3584 Dec 7 22:32 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3585 Mar 24 21:36 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3.ebuild -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3540 Apr 8 05:45 nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756.ebuild So yes, the ebuild is there, but #equery l -p nvidia-kernel [ Searching for package 'nvidia-kernel' in all categories among: ] * installed packages [I--] [M ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8178-r3 (0) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6111-r3 (0) [-P-] [ -] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 (0) [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7167-r1 (0) [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174-r2 (0) [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7667 (0) [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.7676-r1 (0) [-P-] [M~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8174-r1 (0) [-P-] [ ~] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 (0) So I must move somewhere. Portage suggested downgrade, because I keyworded nvidia-kernel by version. Anyway, I keyworded 1.0.8756. I will see what will happen. But I don't see the reasons, why emerge doesn't see 1.0.8178-r3. 2 minutes later: Sorry, I realized just now, that it is hardmasked. So the question has changed. How can I figure out why it was hardmasked? /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask doesn't contain it. TIA. Tamas Sarga -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list