* [gentoo-user] Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
@ 2006-03-23 23:26 Alexander Kirillov
2006-03-31 12:34 ` [gentoo-user] " Peter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kirillov @ 2006-03-23 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi all,
I needed to restart sendmail more than once after upgrade
and noticed the script always produces these warnings:
# /etc/init.d/sendmail restart
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Stopping sendmail ... [ok]
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Starting sendmail ... [ok]
What might be wrong here?
TIA,
Sasha
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
2006-03-23 23:26 [gentoo-user] Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ) Alexander Kirillov
@ 2006-03-31 12:34 ` Peter
2006-03-31 17:02 ` Alexander Kirillov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter @ 2006-03-31 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:26:57 +0300, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I needed to restart sendmail more than once after upgrade
> and noticed the script always produces these warnings:
>
> # /etc/init.d/sendmail restart
> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
> * Stopping sendmail ... [ok]
> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
> * Starting sendmail ... [ok]
>
> What might be wrong here?
>
> TIA,
> Sasha
I have seen this too recently with samba, vmware, ntpd, privoxy and others
(but not always) during both startup and shutdown sequences. I think something
has changed in the init scripts. Everything seems to work OK and there is
nothing in the logs indicating anything wrong.
Example:
mars peter # /etc/init.d/privoxy stop
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Stopping privoxy ... [ ok ]
mars peter # /etc/init.d/privoxy start
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
* Starting privoxy ... [ ok ]
Not sure what's being cached or recached. Makes no sense to me.
Ideas?
--
Peter
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
2006-03-31 12:34 ` [gentoo-user] " Peter
@ 2006-03-31 17:02 ` Alexander Kirillov
2006-03-31 20:35 ` Marton Gabor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kirillov @ 2006-03-31 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
>>I needed to restart sendmail more than once after upgrade
>>and noticed the script always produces these warnings:
>>
>># /etc/init.d/sendmail restart
>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>> * Stopping sendmail ... [ok]
>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>> * Starting sendmail ... [ok]
>>
>>What might be wrong here?
>
> I have seen this too recently with samba, vmware, ntpd, privoxy and others
> (but not always) during both startup and shutdown sequences. I think something
> has changed in the init scripts. Everything seems to work OK and there is
> nothing in the logs indicating anything wrong.
>
> Not sure what's being cached or recached. Makes no sense to me.
> Ideas?
The problem went away and I don't really know why... Probably a reboot.
I also had 2 packages providing firewall service installed at the time.
I've tried to reproduce the problem reinstalling one of them
before writing this reply. Nope. What else?
hw clock on this box is set to local time.
But this happened well after baselayout upgrade
and well after the last reboot.
And sendmail was the only service giving the troubles.
I'm sure I had to restart several others
without any problems.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
2006-03-31 17:02 ` Alexander Kirillov
@ 2006-03-31 20:35 ` Marton Gabor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marton Gabor @ 2006-03-31 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I had the same thing with sshd, I did an etc-update and now the annoying
lines disappeared.
Marton Gabor
<gabor.marton@vehok.vein.hu>,<ICQ UIN: 169394884>,<T: +36 30 447-2042>
GPG fingerprint: 3EF0 B49F C5BF 54A0 00A8 6E72 0F66 74BC BD45 8732
Keyserver: www.keyserver.net -- key ID: 0xBD458732
VE-MIK - VeHoK informatikai megbizott
Alexander Kirillov wrote:
>>> I needed to restart sendmail more than once after upgrade
>>> and noticed the script always produces these warnings:
>>>
>>> # /etc/init.d/sendmail restart
>>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>>> * Stopping sendmail ... [ok]
>>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>>> * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)...
>>> * Starting sendmail ... [ok]
>>>
>>> What might be wrong here?
>>
>>
>> I have seen this too recently with samba, vmware, ntpd, privoxy and
>> others
>> (but not always) during both startup and shutdown sequences. I think
>> something has changed in the init scripts. Everything seems to work OK
>> and there is nothing in the logs indicating anything wrong.
>>
>> Not sure what's being cached or recached. Makes no sense to me.
>> Ideas?
>
>
> The problem went away and I don't really know why... Probably a reboot.
> I also had 2 packages providing firewall service installed at the time.
> I've tried to reproduce the problem reinstalling one of them
> before writing this reply. Nope. What else?
> hw clock on this box is set to local time.
> But this happened well after baselayout upgrade
> and well after the last reboot.
> And sendmail was the only service giving the troubles.
> I'm sure I had to restart several others
> without any problems.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFELZKED2Z0vL1FhzIRAkBxAKDKySFAwczZJC755AaQi1x5bLuV0QCeOnMW
YN9E1+Z4h/63Gb+6MJ2W3mg=
=zdss
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-31 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-23 23:26 [gentoo-user] Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ) Alexander Kirillov
2006-03-31 12:34 ` [gentoo-user] " Peter
2006-03-31 17:02 ` Alexander Kirillov
2006-03-31 20:35 ` Marton Gabor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox