From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-167911-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A7B13888F for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6B59E07FA; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0200.smtp25.com (mail0200.smtp25.com [174.37.170.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A2CE07F1 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t988OpTY004427 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 04:24:52 -0400 From: covici@ccs.covici.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is zfs no longer compatible with systemd? In-reply-to: <561619FB.8090003@cox.net> References: <SWry1r00p1kktTk01WrzEG> <561619FB.8090003@cox.net> Comments: In-reply-to John Campbell <jdc.rpv@cox.net> message dated "Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:23:39 -0700." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.5; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4425.1444292691.1@ccs.covici.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 04:24:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4426.1444292691@ccs.covici.com> X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: s-out-001.smtp25.com-t988OqNQ028030 X-Archives-Salt: 6ce7adc9-f7dc-4c21-95b2-a7895fe64cfa X-Archives-Hash: e21491e5713f6754e722b6cfaed93456 John Campbell <jdc.rpv@cox.net> wrote: > On 10/07/2015 11:51 PM, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > In trying to emerge sysf-fs/zfs today I get the following > > [ebuild R *] sys-fs/zfs-9999::gentoo USE="rootfs -bash-completion > > -custom-cflags -debug (-kernel-builtin) -static-libs -test-suite" > > PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 -python3_3" 0 KiB > > [blocks B ] >=sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-28 > > (">=sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-28" is blocking sys-fs/zfs-9999) > > > > Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 KiB > > Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied) > > > > * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be > > * installed at the same time on the same system. > > > > (sys-fs/zfs-9999:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by > > sys-fs/zfs required by @selected > > sys-fs/zfs > > > > (sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-30:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > > >=sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-25 required by > > (sys-apps/systemd-226-r1:0/2::gentoo, installed) > > > > > > Am I reading this correctly, or is there a way to satisfy the block? > > Just from your output and reading the ebuilds you can downgrade to > udev-init-scripts-27 > Thanks so much -- I wonder why portage did not mention this, but it works now -- thanks. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com