From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-167911-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A7B13888F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  8 Oct 2015 08:25:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6B59E07FA;
	Thu,  8 Oct 2015 08:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail0200.smtp25.com (mail0200.smtp25.com [174.37.170.200])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A2CE07F1
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  8 Oct 2015 08:24:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ccs.covici.com (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t988OpTY004427
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 04:24:52 -0400
From: covici@ccs.covici.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is zfs no longer compatible with systemd?
In-reply-to: <561619FB.8090003@cox.net>
References: <SWry1r00p1kktTk01WrzEG> <561619FB.8090003@cox.net>
Comments: In-reply-to John Campbell <jdc.rpv@cox.net>
   message dated "Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:23:39 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.5; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4425.1444292691.1@ccs.covici.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 04:24:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4426.1444292691@ccs.covici.com>
X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110
X-SpamH-Filter: s-out-001.smtp25.com-t988OqNQ028030
X-Archives-Salt: 6ce7adc9-f7dc-4c21-95b2-a7895fe64cfa
X-Archives-Hash: e21491e5713f6754e722b6cfaed93456

John Campbell <jdc.rpv@cox.net> wrote:

> On 10/07/2015 11:51 PM, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > In trying to emerge sysf-fs/zfs today I get the following
> > [ebuild   R   *] sys-fs/zfs-9999::gentoo  USE="rootfs -bash-completion
> > -custom-cflags -debug (-kernel-builtin) -static-libs -test-suite"
> > PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 -python3_3" 0 KiB
> > [blocks B      ] >=sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-28
> > (">=sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-28" is blocking sys-fs/zfs-9999)
> >
> > Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
> > Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)
> >
> >   * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
> >   * installed at the same time on the same system.
> >
> >    (sys-fs/zfs-9999:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
> >      sys-fs/zfs required by @selected
> >      sys-fs/zfs
> >
> >    (sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-30:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> >      >=sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-25 required by
> >    (sys-apps/systemd-226-r1:0/2::gentoo, installed)
> >
> >
> > Am I reading this correctly, or is there a way to satisfy the block?
> 
> Just from your output and reading the ebuilds you can downgrade to
> udev-init-scripts-27
> 

Thanks so much -- I wonder why portage did not mention this, but it
works now -- thanks.

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         covici@ccs.covici.com