* [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
@ 2006-03-19 17:48 Rohit Sharma
2006-03-19 18:01 ` fire-eyes
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Rohit Sharma @ 2006-03-19 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1957 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-19 17:48 [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! Rohit Sharma
@ 2006-03-19 18:01 ` fire-eyes
2006-03-20 14:07 ` Rohit Sharma
2006-03-19 18:11 ` Jane
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: fire-eyes @ 2006-03-19 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sunday 19 March 2006 12:48, Rohit Sharma wrote:
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DT
[snip]
Please post to this list in plain text and I will consider responding, I was
going to until my client was flooded with stuff appropriate for a web
browser...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-19 18:01 ` fire-eyes
@ 2006-03-20 14:07 ` Rohit Sharma
2006-03-20 14:52 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Rohit Sharma @ 2006-03-20 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
fire-eyes wrote:
>On Sunday 19 March 2006 12:48, Rohit Sharma wrote:
>
>
>><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DT
>>
>>
>[snip]
>Please post to this list in plain text
>
Preference set for the list as "prefers to receive email as plain text"
in my mozilla.
let us see how this one reaches you.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-20 14:07 ` Rohit Sharma
@ 2006-03-20 14:52 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales
2006-03-20 18:17 ` Rohit Sharma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales @ 2006-03-20 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Humm, question. Shouldn't you post this problem on a mozilla
(dev|user) list? It is not specific to Gentoo...
2006/3/20, Rohit Sharma <bhavhit@tiscali.co.uk>:
> fire-eyes wrote:
>
> >On Sunday 19 March 2006 12:48, Rohit Sharma wrote:
> >
> >
> >><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DT
> >>
> >>
> >[snip]
> >Please post to this list in plain text
> >
> Preference set for the list as "prefers to receive email as plain text"
> in my mozilla.
> let us see how this one reaches you.
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-19 17:48 [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! Rohit Sharma
2006-03-19 18:01 ` fire-eyes
@ 2006-03-19 18:11 ` Jane
2006-03-19 18:25 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-03-19 20:55 ` JimD
3 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jane @ 2006-03-19 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 17:48 +0000, Rohit Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Mozilla 1.7.12
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060222
> at my home desktop. However, even when configured to block unrequested
> popups, my mozilla [on both windows and linux] is not able to block
> pop-ups from websites. I assure you this is not a spam/dangerous link
> and you shall know exactly what I mean if you clicked on
>
> http://www.samachar.com/showurl.htm?rurl=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455375.cms?headline=Couples~framing~parents~with~dowry
>
> This is my news-consolidated site that I access every morning.
> What may I be doing wrong?
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Rohit Sharma
>
> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Firefox seems to be ok with this site.
Jane
--
Jane <cas_jane@yahoo.co.uk>
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-19 17:48 [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! Rohit Sharma
2006-03-19 18:01 ` fire-eyes
2006-03-19 18:11 ` Jane
@ 2006-03-19 18:25 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-03-19 20:55 ` JimD
3 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Daniel da Veiga @ 2006-03-19 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
The site is OK, and even with the ridiculous URL redirection by
"samachar" it does not open any popups (at least for me).
On 3/19/06, Rohit Sharma <bhavhit@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Mozilla 1.7.12
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060222
> at my home desktop. However, even when configured to block unrequested
> popups, my mozilla [on both windows and linux] is not able to block pop-ups
> from websites. I assure you this is not a spam/dangerous link and you shall
> know exactly what I mean if you clicked on
>
> http://www.samachar.com/showurl.htm?rurl=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455375.cms?headline=Couples~framing~parents~with~dowry
>
> This is my news-consolidated site that I access every morning.
> What may I be doing wrong?
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Rohit Sharma
> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-19 17:48 [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! Rohit Sharma
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-19 18:25 ` Daniel da Veiga
@ 2006-03-19 20:55 ` JimD
2006-03-20 0:37 ` Peter Ruskin
[not found] ` <D73DF656-5555-4967-A447-553F85FA8EB5@keeliegirl.dyndns.org>
3 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: JimD @ 2006-03-19 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1479 bytes --]
No popups for me. I am using Firefox 1.5 and I also have the adblock extension installed. Looking at adblock it appears that anything from the url ads.indiatimes.com is blocked.
Try putting this line in your /etc/hosts file:
127.0.0.1 ads.indiatimes.com
Or install these two extensions:
For Firefox:
http://adblock.mozdev.org/
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=1136
For Mozilla Sute:
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=10&application=mozilla
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=1136&application=mozilla
Just restart Firefox/Mozilla after you install the two extensions.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: Rohit Sharma
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 12:48 PM
Subject: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
Hi,
I am using Mozilla 1.7.12
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060222
at my home desktop. However, even when configured to block unrequested popups, my mozilla [on both windows and linux] is not able to block pop-ups from websites. I assure you this is not a spam/dangerous link and you shall know exactly what I mean if you clicked on
http://www.samachar.com/showurl.htm?rurl=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1455375.cms?headline=Couples~framing~parents~with~dowry
This is my news-consolidated site that I access every morning.
What may I be doing wrong?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4238 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-19 20:55 ` JimD
@ 2006-03-20 0:37 ` Peter Ruskin
[not found] ` <D73DF656-5555-4967-A447-553F85FA8EB5@keeliegirl.dyndns.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Peter Ruskin @ 2006-03-20 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:55, JimD wrote:
> Or install these two extensions:
>
> For Firefox:
> http://adblock.mozdev.org/
> https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=1136
>
> For Mozilla Sute:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=10&applicat
>ion=mozilla
> https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=1136&applic
>ation=mozilla
>
> Just restart Firefox/Mozilla after you install the two
> extensions.
...or emerge net-proxy/privoxy
--
Peter
========================================================================
Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.54. kernel-2.6.15-gentoo-r5.
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. gcc(GCC): 3.4.5.
KDE: 3.5.1. Qt: 3.3.6.
========================================================================
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread[parent not found: <D73DF656-5555-4967-A447-553F85FA8EB5@keeliegirl.dyndns.org>]
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
[not found] ` <D73DF656-5555-4967-A447-553F85FA8EB5@keeliegirl.dyndns.org>
@ 2006-03-20 1:12 ` JimD
2006-03-20 2:00 ` Peter Ruskin
2006-03-20 18:15 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: JimD @ 2006-03-20 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Peter Ruskin wrote:
>
> ...or emerge net-proxy/privoxy
How is privoxy? Is it fast? I have never tried it. I do think a system
wide setup would be nice. Can privoxy be used across my home network?
Jim
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-20 1:12 ` JimD
@ 2006-03-20 2:00 ` Peter Ruskin
2006-03-20 18:15 ` Dave Jones
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Peter Ruskin @ 2006-03-20 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Monday 20 March 2006 01:12, JimD wrote:
> Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > ...or emerge net-proxy/privoxy
>
> How is privoxy? Is it fast?
Yes.
> I have never tried it. I do think a system wide setup would be
> nice. Can privoxy be used across my home network?
I have it installed on all boxes on my home network. Emerge it and
read the docs. You'll have full control of popup-blocking, etc.
--
Peter
========================================================================
Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.54. kernel-2.6.15-gentoo-r5.
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. gcc(GCC): 3.4.5.
KDE: 3.5.1. Qt: 3.3.6.
========================================================================
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-20 1:12 ` JimD
2006-03-20 2:00 ` Peter Ruskin
@ 2006-03-20 18:15 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-20 18:21 ` JimD
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-03-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi Jim,
I use privoxy as a peer cache for squid.
It works fine across the local network, and seems reasonably fast and
flexible.
My first proxy is squid, which then calls privoxy as its peer.
All my local hosts use squid as their proxy, and get the benefits of
using both squid and provoxy.
The only problem I encountered is that you have to directly access
privoxy to configure it using its web interface, rather than going via
squid. Not a major issue really.
Cheers, Dave
JimD wrote on 03/20/06 02:12:
> Peter Ruskin wrote:
>> ...or emerge net-proxy/privoxy
> How is privoxy? Is it fast? I have never tried it. I do think a
> system wide setup would be nice. Can privoxy be used across my home
> network?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-20 18:15 ` Dave Jones
@ 2006-03-20 18:21 ` JimD
2006-03-20 18:58 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: JimD @ 2006-03-20 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Dave Jones wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I use privoxy as a peer cache for squid.
>
> It works fine across the local network, and seems reasonably fast and
> flexible.
>
> My first proxy is squid, which then calls privoxy as its peer.
>
> All my local hosts use squid as their proxy, and get the benefits of
> using both squid and provoxy.
>
> The only problem I encountered is that you have to directly access
> privoxy to configure it using its web interface, rather than going via
> squid. Not a major issue really.
>
> Cheers, Dave
Privoxy looks pretty nice. However in testing last night I noticed that
gmail would not work unless I went over SSL. Trying to go to
http://mail.google.com/ would just give me a blank page.
Have you run into this issue?
Jim
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-20 18:21 ` JimD
@ 2006-03-20 18:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-20 19:07 ` [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without Jeff
2006-03-20 19:31 ` [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! JimD
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-03-20 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi Jim,
I believe that Gmail *requires* SSL to connect, I don't think it's a
privoxy issue.
I connect to http://gmail.google.com, which seems to redirect to an
https:// link, from there on it's straight in.
Gmail also works fine using SSL and Thunderbird via my squid & privoxy
combination.
Cheers, Dave
JimD wrote on 03/20/06 19:21:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>> I use privoxy as a peer cache for squid.
>> It works fine across the local network, and seems reasonably fast and
>> flexible.
>> My first proxy is squid, which then calls privoxy as its peer.
>> All my local hosts use squid as their proxy, and get the benefits of
>> using both squid and provoxy.
>> The only problem I encountered is that you have to directly access
>> privoxy to configure it using its web interface, rather than going via
>> squid. Not a major issue really.
> Privoxy looks pretty nice. However in testing last night I noticed that
> gmail would not work unless I went over SSL. Trying to go to
> http://mail.google.com/ would just give me a blank page.
> Have you run into this issue?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without.
2006-03-20 18:58 ` Dave Jones
@ 2006-03-20 19:07 ` Jeff
2006-03-20 19:20 ` Jeff
2006-03-20 20:33 ` JimD
2006-03-20 19:31 ` [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! JimD
1 sibling, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeff @ 2006-03-20 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Ok gang, this one absolutely boggles me.
My system:
AMD64 w/1.5G RAM, 200G HD, Audigy2, Realtek NIC, nVidia 6800GS.
So, here's my NIC as it appears in lspci (both with the Live CD, and my
current install):
02:03.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
And the driver:
8139too 28992 0
Now then... as of 2 days ago, I've been noticing that my ethernet has
been acting really whacky, with random ping times and flaky web surfing.
Example ping:
jmg ~ # ping yahoo.com -c 10
PING yahoo.com (66.94.234.13) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47
time=627 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48
time=696 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47
time=85.5 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48
time=728 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48
time=96.4 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=6 ttl=47
time=764 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=7 ttl=47
time=132 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=8 ttl=48
time=800 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=9 ttl=48
time=164 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=10 ttl=48
time=833 ms
--- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9027ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.529/492.918/833.156/309.889 ms
Look at those times. Strange eh? Even more strange, I get a nice even
30-40ms ping when booting with the AMD64 Gentoo CD, so I've ruled out
that my NIC card could be broken. I've also checked my iptables to make
sure nothing's being blocked/dropped, and that looks fine.
Here's ifconfig:
jmg ~ # ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:13:D4:63:AB:45
inet addr:192.168.100.69 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::213:d4ff:fe63:ab45/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1717 errors:2 dropped:4 overruns:1 frame:0
TX packets:1389 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1221100 (1.1 Mb) TX bytes:224935 (219.6 Kb)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x2000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Look at eth0. Errors? Drops? Overruns? Why? What could be wrong with
this NIC all of the sudden? Again, I have 0 problems when booting the
same exact setup with the Live CD.
After doing some simple troubleshooting, I'll admit, I'm stumped. Any
idea why my NIC works great with the Live CD and not with my currently
running system?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without.
2006-03-20 19:07 ` [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without Jeff
@ 2006-03-20 19:20 ` Jeff
2006-03-20 20:33 ` JimD
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeff @ 2006-03-20 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
*sigh*
I hit 'reply' instead of 'compose' DAMMIT!
Sorry...
Jeff wrote:
> Ok gang, this one absolutely boggles me.
>
> My system:
>
> AMD64 w/1.5G RAM, 200G HD, Audigy2, Realtek NIC, nVidia 6800GS.
>
> So, here's my NIC as it appears in lspci (both with the Live CD, and my
> current install):
>
> 02:03.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
>
> And the driver:
>
> 8139too 28992 0
>
> Now then... as of 2 days ago, I've been noticing that my ethernet has
> been acting really whacky, with random ping times and flaky web surfing.
> Example ping:
>
> jmg ~ # ping yahoo.com -c 10
> PING yahoo.com (66.94.234.13) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47
> time=627 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48
> time=696 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47
> time=85.5 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48
> time=728 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48
> time=96.4 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=6 ttl=47
> time=764 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=7 ttl=47
> time=132 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=8 ttl=48
> time=800 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=9 ttl=48
> time=164 ms
> 64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=10 ttl=48
> time=833 ms
>
> --- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
> 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9027ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.529/492.918/833.156/309.889 ms
>
> Look at those times. Strange eh? Even more strange, I get a nice even
> 30-40ms ping when booting with the AMD64 Gentoo CD, so I've ruled out
> that my NIC card could be broken. I've also checked my iptables to make
> sure nothing's being blocked/dropped, and that looks fine.
>
> Here's ifconfig:
>
> jmg ~ # ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:13:D4:63:AB:45
> inet addr:192.168.100.69 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::213:d4ff:fe63:ab45/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1717 errors:2 dropped:4 overruns:1 frame:0
> TX packets:1389 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:1221100 (1.1 Mb) TX bytes:224935 (219.6 Kb)
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x2000
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>
> Look at eth0. Errors? Drops? Overruns? Why? What could be wrong with
> this NIC all of the sudden? Again, I have 0 problems when booting the
> same exact setup with the Live CD.
>
> After doing some simple troubleshooting, I'll admit, I'm stumped. Any
> idea why my NIC works great with the Live CD and not with my currently
> running system?
--
Emperor Palpatine:
Everything that has transpired has done so according
to my design.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without.
2006-03-20 19:07 ` [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without Jeff
2006-03-20 19:20 ` Jeff
@ 2006-03-20 20:33 ` JimD
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: JimD @ 2006-03-20 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Jeff wrote:
> Ok gang, this one absolutely boggles me.
>
> My system:
>
> AMD64 w/1.5G RAM, 200G HD, Audigy2, Realtek NIC, nVidia 6800GS.
>
> So, here's my NIC as it appears in lspci (both with the Live CD, and my
> current install):
>
> 02:03.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
<snip>
repost so it threads right.
I am building a similar AMD64 today, well if UPS ever stinkin gets here : )
I will see if I get similar issues. What kernel a you running? I
compiled my own kerenle on my x86 and I was having weird NIC issues as
well. However, my issues were the opposite. I would get get ping times
and transfer rates for outside neteworks. My home network would see to
be touch and go over wireless. I am not sure if the issue is resolved
or not yet. I will have to wait until I get my AMD64 built.
Do you happen to have a cheap PCI NIC you can slap in to test with?
Jim
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !!
2006-03-20 18:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-20 19:07 ` [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without Jeff
@ 2006-03-20 19:31 ` JimD
2006-03-20 23:51 ` Dave Jones
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: JimD @ 2006-03-20 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Dave Jones wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I believe that Gmail *requires* SSL to connect, I don't think it's a
> privoxy issue.
I am not getting redirected:
http://keeliegirl.dyndns.org/temp/GMail.png
The following doesn't work with privoxy on:
http://mail.google.com/mail/
This one however does work with privoxy on:
https://mail.google.com/mail/
Things that make you go, hmmmm.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without.
@ 2006-03-20 20:49 Jeff
2006-03-20 20:30 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeff @ 2006-03-20 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Ok gang, this one absolutely boggles me.
My system:
AMD64 w/1.5G RAM, 200G HD, Audigy2, Realtek NIC, nVidia 6800GS.
So, here's my NIC as it appears in lspci (both with the Live CD, and my
current install):
02:03.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
And the driver:
8139too 28992 0
Now then... as of 2 days ago, I've been noticing that my ethernet has
been acting really whacky, with random ping times and flaky web surfing.
Example ping:
jmg ~ # ping yahoo.com -c 10
PING yahoo.com (66.94.234.13) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47
time=627 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48
time=696 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47
time=85.5 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48
time=728 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48
time=96.4 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=6 ttl=47
time=764 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=7 ttl=47
time=132 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=8 ttl=48
time=800 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=9 ttl=48
time=164 ms
64 bytes from w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com (66.94.234.13): icmp_seq=10 ttl=48
time=833 ms
--- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9027ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.529/492.918/833.156/309.889 ms
Look at those times. Strange eh? Even more strange, I get a nice even
30-40ms ping when booting with the AMD64 Gentoo CD, so I've ruled out
that my NIC card could be broken. I've also checked my iptables to make
sure nothing's being blocked/dropped, and that looks fine.
Here's ifconfig:
jmg ~ # ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:13:D4:63:AB:45
inet addr:192.168.100.69 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::213:d4ff:fe63:ab45/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1717 errors:2 dropped:4 overruns:1 frame:0
TX packets:1389 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1221100 (1.1 Mb) TX bytes:224935 (219.6 Kb)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x2000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Look at eth0. Errors? Drops? Overruns? Why? What could be wrong with
this NIC all of the sudden? Again, I have 0 problems when booting the
same exact setup with the Live CD.
After doing some simple troubleshooting, I'll admit, I'm stumped. Any
idea why my NIC works great with the Live CD and not with my currently
running system?
--
Emperor Palpatine:
Everything that has transpired has done so according
to my design.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-21 0:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-19 17:48 [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! Rohit Sharma
2006-03-19 18:01 ` fire-eyes
2006-03-20 14:07 ` Rohit Sharma
2006-03-20 14:52 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales
2006-03-20 18:17 ` Rohit Sharma
2006-03-19 18:11 ` Jane
2006-03-19 18:25 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-03-19 20:55 ` JimD
2006-03-20 0:37 ` Peter Ruskin
[not found] ` <D73DF656-5555-4967-A447-553F85FA8EB5@keeliegirl.dyndns.org>
2006-03-20 1:12 ` JimD
2006-03-20 2:00 ` Peter Ruskin
2006-03-20 18:15 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-20 18:21 ` JimD
2006-03-20 18:58 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-20 19:07 ` [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without Jeff
2006-03-20 19:20 ` Jeff
2006-03-20 20:33 ` JimD
2006-03-20 19:31 ` [gentoo-user] Mozilla - pop-ups not blocked !! JimD
2006-03-20 23:51 ` Dave Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-20 20:49 [gentoo-user] NIC works fine with Gentoo Live CD, not so good without Jeff
2006-03-20 20:30 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
