From: gentuxx <gentuxx@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Updated gentoo systems and fresh installs
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:23:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4415E2C7.4050505@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b1675090603131254x16e315e4uee810f8c81f08434@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Trenton Adams wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>Is there a difference between the two? I have 2005.1 installed. As
>I've always understood it, my system will now always be up-to-date, as
>long as I keep updating it. Is 2006.0 any different than 2005.1 after
>the system has been installed?
>
>I'm just curious, because I have to install gentoo on a notebook, but
>I want package compatibility with my server.
>
>Thanks.
>
As I understand it, this is essentially true. As long as you continue
to update your system, it will remain up to a date. However,
depending upon your architecture, there may be packages that are
masked by profile. I've really only seen this on SPARC systems, but
others may pop up as well. For example, the 2.6 kernel is masked in
the 2005.1 SPARC profile, but not in the 2006.0 profile. I am still
running the 2005.0 on my P4 x86 system, and haven't run into any
profile-related issues.
- --
gentux
echo "hfouvyAdpy/ofu" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'
gentux's gpg fingerprint ==> 34CE 2E97 40C7 EF6E EC40 9795 2D81 924A
6996 0993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEFeLGLYGSSmmWCZMRAgG4AKCb/OTawnb9CszNr8EyCZhmn8NbiwCfed7A
tHihV+1ac3E8EcySPKJNZDM=
=yklO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 20:54 [gentoo-user] Updated gentoo systems and fresh installs Trenton Adams
2006-03-13 21:10 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-03-13 21:19 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-03-13 21:23 ` gentuxx [this message]
2006-03-13 21:33 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-03-14 1:24 ` Trenton Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4415E2C7.4050505@gmail.com \
--to=gentuxx@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox