[gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[Seo Boon, NG]

I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout upgrade.
My lo interface can comes alive after I manually do a "ifconfig lo up". Any I'm
operating a number of services on lo, I need lo to be up and running afteri each
reboot. Any idea how to fix this? Thanks.

init.d £ ./net.lo start
 * Caching service dependencies ...
 *  Service 'cupsd' should be AFTER service 'vmware', but one of
 *  the services 'vmware' depends on, depends on 'cupsd'!                 [ ok ]
 *  * Starting lo
 *   Bringing up lo
 *     "127.0.0.1/8"
 *     No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)    [ !! ]
 *  brd
 *  No loaded modules provide "brd" (brd_start)
 *  127.255.255.255"

-- 
SB
http://www.employees.org/‾sbng/pgp.txt
Key fingerprint = 5945 5E12 25A9 2404 8900  E171 052C 33B6 E210 AB93
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[gentuxx]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Seo Boon, NG wrote:

>I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout
upgrade.
>My lo interface can comes alive after I manually do a "ifconfig lo up".
Any I'm
>operating a number of services on lo, I need lo to be up and running
afteri each
>reboot. Any idea how to fix this? Thanks.
>
>init.d £ ./net.lo start
> * Caching service dependencies ...
> * Service 'cupsd' should be AFTER service 'vmware', but one of
> * the services 'vmware' depends on, depends on 'cupsd'! [ ok ]
> * * Starting lo
> * Bringing up lo
> * "127.0.0.1/8"
> * No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start) [ !! ]
> * brd
> * No loaded modules provide "brd" (brd_start)
> * 127.255.255.255"
>
Are you running a customly configured kernel? Do you have loopback
support enabled (in your kernel)?

- --
gentux
echo "hfouvyAdpy/ofu" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'

gentux's gpg fingerprint ==> 34CE 2E97 40C7 EF6E EC40  9795 2D81 924A
6996 0993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEAznWLYGSSmmWCZMRAlmjAKDW76t4Fvi6ibcir21C19qcuxEFyACfQKHo
z57EddKPt82UUizrooRc1As=
=EFeG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[Richard Fish]

On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <sbng@employees.org> wrote:
>  *   Bringing up lo
>  *     "127.0.0.1/8"
>  *     No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)    [ !! ]

Looks like your /etc/conf.d/net file is confused.  Please post the
contents of that file, and also specify which version of baselayout
you are using.

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[RockerZ71]

On Monday 27 February 2006 12:52, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <sbng@employees.org> wrote:
> >  *   Bringing up lo
> >  *     "127.0.0.1/8"
> >  *     No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)   
> > [ !! ]


etc-update and then check out /etc/conf.d/net.  I had this same problem a few 
weeks ago and I think I fixed it by just commenting out just about everything 
in that file that wasn't already commented.  all I have in it now is:

modules=( "dhcpcd" )
config_eth1=( "dhcp" )
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[Seo Boon, NG]

Wrote Richard Fish on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:52:49AM SGT:
> On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <sbng@employees.org> wrote:
> >  *   Bringing up lo
> >  *     "127.0.0.1/8"
> >  *     No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)    [ !! ]
> 
> Looks like your /etc/conf.d/net file is confused.  Please post the
> contents of that file, and also specify which version of baselayout
> you are using.

My baselayout is:

*  sys-apps/baselayout
      Latest version available: 1.12.0_pre16-r1
      Latest version installed: 1.12.0_pre16-r1
      Size of files: 632 kB
      Homepage:      http://www.gentoo.org/
      Description:   Filesystem baselayout and init scripts
      License:       GPL-2

/etc/conf.d/net only has one entry. 
iface_eth0="dhcp"

> 
> -Richard
> 
> -- 
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
SB
http://www.employees.org/‾sbng/pgp.txt
Key fingerprint = 5945 5E12 25A9 2404 8900  E171 052C 33B6 E210 AB93
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[Richard Fish]

On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <sbng@employees.org> wrote:
> /etc/conf.d/net only has one entry.
> iface_eth0="dhcp"

I believe this is incorrect.  Looking at net.example from the same
version of baselayout has no syntax for iface_eth0="dhcp".  I think
the correct syntax is now:

config_eth0=( "dhcp" )

Although, I think this is also the default, so should not be necessary.

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

On Monday 27 February 2006 10:39, "Seo Boon, NG" <sbng@employees.org> wrote 
about '[gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...':
> I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout
> upgrade.
>
>  *     No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)  
>  [ !! ] *  brd
>  *  No loaded modules provide "brd" (brd_start)
>  *  127.255.255.255"

Last time I saw this error is was because of upgrade to bash.  You might 
try downgrading bash to a known good version.  That fixed it for my 
friend.  (After much gnashing of teeth since he was out of town and 
provides internet services and it broke one of his eth interfaces.)

-- 
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[Alan E. Davis]

I am pretty much clueless, in general; however, I might report that I,
too, recently experienced this same breakdown in all of the net
interfaces on one of my machines.  This appeared after a massive
update to a ~x86 system involving over 700MB of downloads.  It took
several days to perform the update, and --- albeit I cannot pinpoint
the exact cause of my griefs (X11 also failed when started from the
enlightenment display manager 'entrance') after I had finally gotten
my network connection established and run all of the following,
everything works again.

                emerge --sync

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

[Seo Boon, NG]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1383 bytes --]

Wrote Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:50:01PM SGT:
> On Monday 27 February 2006 10:39, "Seo Boon, NG" <sbng@employees.org> wrote 
> about '[gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...':
> > I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout
> > upgrade.
> >
> >  *     No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)  
> >  [ !! ] *  brd
> >  *  No loaded modules provide "brd" (brd_start)
> >  *  127.255.255.255"
> 
> Last time I saw this error is was because of upgrade to bash.  You might 
> try downgrading bash to a known good version.  That fixed it for my 
> friend.  (After much gnashing of teeth since he was out of town and 
> provides internet services and it broke one of his eth interfaces.)

Bingo, that was it. Downgraded to the last version of bash and it's working now.
Thanks a lot. Just for the archive, my last stable version is:

Latest version installed: 3.0-r12

> 
> -- 
> "If there's one thing we've established over the years,
> it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
> clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
> -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
> -- 
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
SB
http://www.employees.org/‾sbng/pgp.txt
Key fingerprint = 5945 5E12 25A9 2404 8900  E171 052C 33B6 E210 AB93

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 203 bytes --]