From: Alexander Skwar <listen@alexander.skwar.name>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:26:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <440030E4.3000505@mid.message-center.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44000D63.3060101@gmx.net>
Jarry wrote:
> Zac Slade wrote:
>
>> reiser3, resizable online in two ways
>> 1)resize_reiserfs /path/to/dev
>> 2)mount -o remount,resize /path/to/dev
>> XFS, MUST be mounted to resize use xfs_grow /mount/point
>> JFS, resizable online with a mount -o remount,resize /path/to/dev
>> ext2/3, resizable offline reliably. Online resize is a *very* experimental
>> experiment. Have good backups.
>
> If I understand correctly, it is not worth having lvm2 with ext3, right?
Well, "not worth" is too hard. One of the main benefits of LVM
is, that you can easily extend (and theoretically shrink)
filesystems. Since ext* can, in practicallity, only be resized
offline, one of the benefits goes away. Also, extending and
shrinking ext* takes *AGES*, as you MUST run "e2fsck -f $dev"
beforehand.
> I could not resize /usr or /var off-line,
That's wrong. I suppose that those are your ext* fs?
If so, you can perfectly fine resize those fs while
they are offline.
> and resizing while mounted
> is not possible without kernel patch, and still only experimental.
> Then maybe I should get rid of lvm2...
No. Get rid of ext*. reiser3 and xfs are mature, use those
instead.
Alexander Skwar
--
If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, then
you clearly don't understand the situation.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-25 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 20:22 [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question CR Little
2006-02-23 20:41 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-23 20:59 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-23 21:15 ` Qv6
2006-02-23 21:59 ` John Jolet
2006-02-23 22:35 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-24 6:03 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 3:35 ` Zac Slade
2006-02-25 4:13 ` John Jolet
2006-02-25 4:32 ` Zac Slade
2006-02-25 5:14 ` John Jolet
2006-02-25 6:52 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 6:44 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 6:43 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 11:24 ` Holly Bostick
2006-02-25 12:21 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 7:55 ` Jarry
2006-02-25 10:26 ` Alexander Skwar [this message]
2006-02-25 10:44 ` Jarry
2006-02-25 11:11 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 15:01 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-27 6:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Dirk Heinrichs
2006-02-28 5:01 ` Zac Slade
2006-02-28 9:03 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2006-02-28 9:23 ` Zac Slade
2006-02-28 9:29 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-28 13:53 ` Dirk Heinrichs
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-23 20:58 CR Little
2006-02-23 21:36 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-23 21:41 CR Little
2006-02-23 23:29 CR Little
2006-02-23 23:57 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-24 14:40 CR Little
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=440030E4.3000505@mid.message-center.info \
--to=listen@alexander.skwar.name \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox