From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FBi9e-00025g-7m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:46:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1M0jrZt008092; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:45:53 GMT Received: from mail.sarai.net (mail.sarai.net [195.169.149.102]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1M0c8Sw020431 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:38:08 GMT Received: by mail.sarai.net (Postfix, from userid 1058) id B293428DA1B; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:37:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [61.16.182.80] (unknown [61.16.182.80]) by mail.sarai.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD96A28D8C1 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:37:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43FBB26B.40904@sarai.net> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:08:03 +0530 From: Aniruddha Shankar User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060214) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync References: <1140516464.23492.2.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <200602210524.44868.bss03@volumehost.com> In-Reply-To: <200602210524.44868.bss03@volumehost.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.sarai.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.5 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, UPPERCASE_25_50,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.0.4 X-Sanitizer: Mail Sanitizer Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e8b0727f-a0d8-4f92-a219-67ec96256d0b X-Archives-Hash: f4a1d6729e91b0fb84c582e91f1c28d5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > That said, it would be nice to do away with the "building file list..." > delay we have with rsync. That I can live with. It's the updating portage cache - especially the long wait at 50% that drags. K -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD+7JqhJkrd6A3rSsRAhCjAKCpM2MJOicqgRrS/qcfnPZhrbyXzQCfVPMz ulCZNtBVarR+QTXE4Xw0+4Q= =tlOw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list