From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FBgFG-00086w-6d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:44:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1LMhXDK006726; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:43:33 GMT Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1LMdgMn032639 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:39:42 GMT Received: from mail.joat.com ([71.114.144.163]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IV200FJB6Y5GWJ2@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:39:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (cornholio.joat.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.joat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8280F145B8 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:39:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.joat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.joat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03386-01 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:39:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dnebing.tbbgl.com [141.151.196.13]) by mail.joat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:39:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:38:32 -0500 From: Dave Nebinger Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] etc/host.conf: line 24: bad command `mdns off' In-reply-to: <200602211932.19481.rumen@qrypto.org> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <43FB9668.2060604@joat.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at joat.com References: <1140483471.10641.4.camel@orpheus> <43FB3927.802@pnpitalia.it> <43FB4412.3060804@joat.com> <200602211932.19481.rumen@qrypto.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060130 SeaMonkey/1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 914fed6e-5fec-4de2-a2ce-550c7f34f742 X-Archives-Hash: fe16a597d656105ca31e1edf86727590 Rumen Yotov wrote: >> >> Or how about the fact that glibc 2.3.6-r3 (as 2.3.6 in general) is >> masked in Portage indicating that you should expect problems if you're >> going to build your box on an unstable version of glibc? >> > Please don't scare me, it's in testing (not masked). At least 2.3.6-r2|3. > ->*2.3.6 *2.3.6-r1 ~2.3.6-r2 ~2.3.6-r3 In testing, yes, but it is still (soft) masked. Glibc is the core of the system; if there is *any* package you *don't* install unless it is unmasked entirely, it would be glibc. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list