From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F5ow0-0000FR-9O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:48:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k15Ik1YQ008087; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:46:01 GMT Received: from hetzner.email-server.info (new.email-server.info [213.133.109.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k15IR5WS010272 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:27:05 GMT Received: from hd.bei.digitalprojects.com (e182061167.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.182.61.167]) by hetzner.email-server.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F875274006 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:27:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (blatt.bei.digitalprojects.com [192.168.1.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hd.bei.digitalprojects.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9602AB8C09A for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:27:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43E64378.2080206@mid.email-server.info> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:27:04 +0100 From: Alexander Skwar User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060113) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Lost my coreutils References: <200602052313.30204.bogo-mipps@e3.net.nz> <200602051354.01959.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> <200602051405.32977.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> <43E622C9.3070802@ultratux.org> In-Reply-To: <43E622C9.3070802@ultratux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a5974194-2b69-48d6-8834-1dfbff16d546 X-Archives-Hash: cf64a892c5a07e8794c962f422712161 Maarten wrote: > Benno Schulenberg wrote: >> Benno Schulenberg wrote: >> /bin/ln > ^^^^^^^ > > Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the > symlink from ln -> busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ? There's no requirement for ln being a symlink. Instead, you could also copy busybox to ln - cp busybox ln. Alexander Skwar -- All generalisations are dangerous, including this one. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list