* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-08 20:35 [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root Christian Floeter
@ 2006-01-08 19:56 ` Abhay Kedia
2006-01-08 22:03 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-09 3:55 ` Richard Fish
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Abhay Kedia @ 2006-01-08 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 267 bytes --]
On Monday 09 January 2006 02:05, Christian Floeter wrote:
>
> my Canon LiDE 25 scanner is only recognized by scanimage when logged in
> as root.
>
A shot in the dark. Could this be the solution?
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Install_a_USB_scanner#UDEV
Regards,
Abhay
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
@ 2006-01-08 20:35 Christian Floeter
2006-01-08 19:56 ` Abhay Kedia
2006-01-09 3:55 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christian Floeter @ 2006-01-08 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
my Canon LiDE 25 scanner is only recognized by scanimage when logged in
as root.
I have:
kernel 2.6.15-rc7 vanilla, udev 079, libusb 0.1.10a, sane-backends
1.0.17, xsane 0.98a-r1, sane-frontends 1.0.14.
My user is in the usb and scanner groups, and my USE flags contain usb
and scanner as well.
Permissions in /proc/bus/usb are set correctly when the scanner is
plugged in:
cf@sakura ~ $ sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2220 [CanoScan],
chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:004:011
cf@sakura ~ $ ls -l /proc/bus/usb/004
total 0
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 43 8. Jan 09:59 001
-rw-rw---- 1 root scanner 57 8. Jan 09:59 011
And I have a /var/lib/lock/sane directory, as required by the plustek
backend:
sakura linux # ls -l /var/lib/lock/
total 4
drwxrwx--- 2 root scanner 4096 7. Jan 12:39 sane
And still, scanimage cannot find the scanner as user:
cf@sakura ~ $ scanimage -L
No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).
Whereas as root, it gives:
sakura linux # scanimage -L
device `plustek:libusb:004:011' is a Canon LiDE25 USB flatbed scanner
So what's missing here? How can I get it to work when logged in as user?
Do other LiDE owners experience the same problem?
C.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-08 19:56 ` Abhay Kedia
@ 2006-01-08 22:03 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-09 3:56 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christian Floeter @ 2006-01-08 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Abhay Kedia wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2006 02:05, Christian Floeter wrote:
>
>>my Canon LiDE 25 scanner is only recognized by scanimage when logged in
>>as root.
>>
>
> A shot in the dark. Could this be the solution?
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Install_a_USB_scanner#UDEV
No, doesn't work. I've tried the given udev rule and the 'usbscanner'
init script, without success.
C.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-08 20:35 [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root Christian Floeter
2006-01-08 19:56 ` Abhay Kedia
@ 2006-01-09 3:55 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-09 10:07 ` Christian Floeter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-01-09 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 1/8/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
> cf@sakura ~ $ scanimage -L
>
> No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
> check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
> sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
> which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).
>
> Whereas as root, it gives:
>
> sakura linux # scanimage -L
> device `plustek:libusb:004:011' is a Canon LiDE25 USB flatbed scanner
>
> So what's missing here? How can I get it to work when logged in as user?
> Do other LiDE owners experience the same problem?
No similar problem here (LIDE35, genesys backend). Take a look at (or
post) the output of
strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-08 22:03 ` Christian Floeter
@ 2006-01-09 3:56 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-01-09 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 1/8/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
> Abhay Kedia wrote:
> > On Monday 09 January 2006 02:05, Christian Floeter wrote:
> >
> >>my Canon LiDE 25 scanner is only recognized by scanimage when logged in
> >>as root.
> >>
> >
> > A shot in the dark. Could this be the solution?
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Install_a_USB_scanner#UDEV
>
> No, doesn't work. I've tried the given udev rule and the 'usbscanner'
> init script, without success.
BTW, that page has some errors on it. Particularly, for udev where it
says .rules, it should be .permissions. However I didn't have to do
any of that to get my scanner working as a regular user.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-09 3:55 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-01-09 10:07 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-09 14:40 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christian Floeter @ 2006-01-09 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Richard Fish wrote:
> No similar problem here (LIDE35, genesys backend). Take a look at (or
> post) the output of
>
> strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
cf@sakura ~ $ strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/lib/libpthread.so.0", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/usr/lib/libieee1284.so.3", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/usr/lib/libgphoto2.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/usr/lib/libgphoto2_port.so.0", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/lib/libdl.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/lib/libm.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/proc/scsi/scsi", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/proc/scsi/scsi", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/dev/scanner", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
open("/dev/sg0", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg1", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg2", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg3", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg4", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg5", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg6", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg7", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg8", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sg9", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sga", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgb", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgc", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgd", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sge", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgf", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgg", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgh", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgi", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgj", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgk", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgl", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgm", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgn", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgo", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgp", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgq", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgr", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgs", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgt", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgu", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgv", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgw", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgx", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgy", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/dev/sgz", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_EXCL) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/proc/devices", O_RDONLY) = 3
open("/dev/", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/004", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 4
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/001", O_RDWR) = 4
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/003", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/002", O_RDWR) = 4
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/001", O_RDWR) = 4
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/002", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/002", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/002/001", O_RDWR) = 4
open("/proc/bus/usb/002/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/001", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDWR) = 4
open("/proc/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 3
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2220 [CanoScan],
chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:004:015
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/004/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/002", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/002", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/003/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/002/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/002/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDWR) = 3
open("/proc/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDWR) = 3
Any hints in there?
C.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-09 10:07 ` Christian Floeter
@ 2006-01-09 14:40 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-09 14:46 ` Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
2006-01-09 16:46 ` Christian Floeter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-01-09 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 1/9/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
> Richard Fish wrote:
>
> > No similar problem here (LIDE35, genesys backend). Take a look at (or
> > post) the output of
> >
> > strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
>
> cf@sakura ~ $ strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
> open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 3
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2220 [CanoScan],
> chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:004:015
Did you run this as a regular user, or as root, because this found your scanner.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-09 14:40 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-01-09 14:46 ` Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
2006-01-09 16:49 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-09 16:46 ` Christian Floeter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3) @ 2006-01-09 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Richard Fish, who happens to be smarter than you, thinks:
> On 1/9/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Richard Fish wrote:
> > > No similar problem here (LIDE35, genesys backend). Take a look at (or
> > > post) the output of
> > > strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
> > cf@sakura ~ $ strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
> > open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 3
> > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2220 [CanoScan],
> > chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:004:015
# emerge sys-apps/coldplug
# rc-update add coldplug default
# /etc/init.d/coldplug
$ sane-find-scanner -q
:)
--
ASHes to ASHes, DOS to DOS.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-09 14:40 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-09 14:46 ` Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
@ 2006-01-09 16:46 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-10 4:07 ` Richard Fish
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christian Floeter @ 2006-01-09 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Richard Fish wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>>Richard Fish wrote:
>>
>>
>>>No similar problem here (LIDE35, genesys backend). Take a look at (or
>>>post) the output of
>>>
>>>strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
>>
>>cf@sakura ~ $ strace -e open sane-find-scanner -q
>>open("/proc/bus/usb/004/015", O_RDWR) = 3
>>found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2220 [CanoScan],
>>chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:004:015
>
>
> Did you run this as a regular user, or as root, because this found your scanner.
As a user (as can be seen by the $ prompt). I ran it as root too, but
the output was identical.
BTW, sane-find-scanner always finds my scanner, it's scanimage that doesn't.
C.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-09 14:46 ` Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
@ 2006-01-09 16:49 ` Christian Floeter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christian Floeter @ 2006-01-09 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3) wrote:
> # emerge sys-apps/coldplug
> # rc-update add coldplug default
> # /etc/init.d/coldplug
> $ sane-find-scanner -q
sakura cf # rc-update show
alsasound |
aumix |
bootmisc | boot
checkfs | boot
checkroot | boot
clock | boot
coldplug | boot
consolefont | boot
crypto-loop |
cupsd | default
domainname | boot default
famd |
gpm |
hdparm |
hostname | boot
hotplug | boot
keymaps | boot
local | default nonetwork
localmount | boot
modules | boot
net.eth0 |
net.lo | boot
net.ppp0 |
netmount | default
nscd |
numlock |
portmap |
rmnologin | boot
rsyncd |
sshd |
syslog-ng | default
urandom | boot
vixie-cron | default
xdm |
xprint |
C.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-09 16:46 ` Christian Floeter
@ 2006-01-10 4:07 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-10 11:51 ` [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] " Christian Floeter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-01-10 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 1/9/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
> BTW, sane-find-scanner always finds my scanner, it's scanimage that doesn't.
Ok, sounds like a sane configuration or installation issue, not really
a system problem. Let's try something with scanimage:
strace -f -e open scanimage -L 2>&1 | grep -e lib -e /etc -e /proc/bus/usb
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-10 4:07 ` Richard Fish
@ 2006-01-10 11:51 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-10 14:14 ` Ernie Schroder
2006-01-10 15:15 ` Richard Fish
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christian Floeter @ 2006-01-10 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Richard Fish wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>>BTW, sane-find-scanner always finds my scanner, it's scanimage that doesn't.
>
>
> Ok, sounds like a sane configuration or installation issue, not really
> a system problem. Let's try something with scanimage:
>
> strace -f -e open scanimage -L 2>&1 | grep -e lib -e /etc -e /proc/bus/usb
Problem solved! :)
strace listed the following line:
open("/var/lib/lock/sane/LCK..libusb:004:016", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL,
0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
I found that /var/lib/lock had permissions 660, so I changed it to 775
and the scanner was correctly found as user. Surely something the ebuild
should have done for me... :-/
Thanks Richard for your help. strace really is a tool worth remembering for.
While we're here, I have to say that I'm still not that lucky with my
LiDE 25 scanner. When scanning under Linux, the output shows vertical
stripes, whereas under Windoze the output is faultless. Can something be
done about it? What about other LiDE's out there?
C.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-10 11:51 ` [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] " Christian Floeter
@ 2006-01-10 14:14 ` Ernie Schroder
2006-01-10 15:15 ` Richard Fish
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ernie Schroder @ 2006-01-10 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:51, a tiny voice compelled Christian Floeter to
write:
> Richard Fish wrote:
> > On 1/9/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
> >>BTW, sane-find-scanner always finds my scanner, it's scanimage that
> >> doesn't.
> >
> > Ok, sounds like a sane configuration or installation issue, not really
> > a system problem. Let's try something with scanimage:
> >
> > strace -f -e open scanimage -L 2>&1 | grep -e lib -e /etc -e
> > /proc/bus/usb
>
> Problem solved! :)
>
> strace listed the following line:
>
> open("/var/lib/lock/sane/LCK..libusb:004:016", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL,
> 0644) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
>
> I found that /var/lib/lock had permissions 660, so I changed it to 775
> and the scanner was correctly found as user. Surely something the ebuild
> should have done for me... :-/
>
> Thanks Richard for your help. strace really is a tool worth remembering
> for.
>
> While we're here, I have to say that I'm still not that lucky with my
> LiDE 25 scanner. When scanning under Linux, the output shows vertical
> stripes, whereas under Windoze the output is faultless. Can something be
> done about it? What about other LiDE's out there?
>
> C.
Christian,
Give the archives here a try, or join and ask. ane-devel is an active, very
informed group and you'll get all the help you need there.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
--
Regards, Ernie
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root
2006-01-10 11:51 ` [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] " Christian Floeter
2006-01-10 14:14 ` Ernie Schroder
@ 2006-01-10 15:15 ` Richard Fish
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fish @ 2006-01-10 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 1/10/06, Christian Floeter <pyramid04@gmx.net> wrote:
> While we're here, I have to say that I'm still not that lucky with my
> LiDE 25 scanner. When scanning under Linux, the output shows vertical
> stripes, whereas under Windoze the output is faultless. Can something be
> done about it? What about other LiDE's out there?
I had an LiDE 25 for a while before it broke (it didn't survive a
badly packed suitcase!). Support for the LiDE 35 was just added in
the most recent release of sane, so I don't have a lot of experience
with it. All of my scanning is documents...bills, receipts for
expense reports, that sort of thing. Never had any problem like you
describe, but I am using Kooka as the frontend.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-10 15:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-08 20:35 [gentoo-user] USB scanner (Canon LiDE 25) only recognized as root Christian Floeter
2006-01-08 19:56 ` Abhay Kedia
2006-01-08 22:03 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-09 3:56 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-09 3:55 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-09 10:07 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-09 14:40 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-09 14:46 ` Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
2006-01-09 16:49 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-09 16:46 ` Christian Floeter
2006-01-10 4:07 ` Richard Fish
2006-01-10 11:51 ` [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] " Christian Floeter
2006-01-10 14:14 ` Ernie Schroder
2006-01-10 15:15 ` Richard Fish
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox