From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B3E0158086 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD5992BC03B; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:1e9::8849]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBB682BC00F for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Contact-TNet-Consulting-Abuse-for-assistance by tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id 1BKNcG3W019381 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:38:16 -0600 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Local mail delivery agent (MDA) wanted To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <834c4654-8b15-dc5f-8cf1-8e874342b87a@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <86d62c1c-6e16-67cd-65a9-be6f1e6916b6@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> From: Grant Taylor Organization: TNet Consulting Message-ID: <439df54b-c2d1-3878-8400-804bafc7463a@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:38:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0c01651a-532f-457a-93df-9040af537d96 X-Archives-Hash: e9d107f20b45e82bb7ebc995a12c946d On 12/20/21 3:37 PM, Wol wrote: > You mean the body sans envelope? Kinda, sorta, yes, no, maybe. I'd have to compare the two formats to be able to say more definitively, or with any certainty. But, ya, that's the /type/ of difference that I'm thinking of. Aside: What /actually/ is the body vs envelope? In SMTP it's simple, it, everything between the DATA and the trailing . is the body the MAIL FROM: and RCPT TO(s) are envelope. But RFC 822 messages on disk, that's a bit of a horse of a different color. It's easy to differentiate body from headers, but envelope??? -- Grant. . . . unix || die