Re: [gentoo-user] Berkeley DB patch required (I think)

[Mike Kenny <mikekenny@telkomsa.net>]

Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:04:56 +0200
> Mike Kenny <mikekenny@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Dec 13 15:56:00 getafix slapd[7156]: bdb(dc=inzanix,dc=com): illegal 
>>flag specified to txn_begin
>>Dec 13 15:56:00 getafix slapd[7156]: bdb_txn_get: BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 
>>library needs TXN patch!
>>Dec 13 15:56:00 getafix slapd[7156]: conn=0 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=49 text=
>>
>>I know this is not specifically a gentoo issue, more LDAP or OX, but I 
>>then followed the reference to a required patch on the second last line 
>>of messages. I wanted to check what versions of bdb were available, but
>>[... only found one...]
> 
> 
> As it's clearly LDAP which is complaining here, it would be interesting
> - if that's actually the OpenLDAP compiled on your Gentoo, and if yes,
> - what a re-emerge of OpenLDAP causes and
> - what USE flags you're using for OpenLDAP
> 
> -hwh
I'll run an emerge on it and see what the results are. My USE flags are 
default. Which in /etc/make.conf are:
USE="-X -alsa -oss -gif -mad -gpm -gnome -motif -mikmod -encode -kde 
-apm -nls -arts -avi -bitmap-fonts -cups -foomaticdb -gtk -gtk2 -ipv6 
-jpeg -mpeg -oggvorbis -opengl -pdflib -png -qt -quicktime -readline 
-sdl -truetype -xmms -xv apache2 nptl ssl pam ssh"
Is there somewhere else I should check for these flags?

-- 
mike kenny
Linux Registered User #381724
LPI ID# 80080

"Hell, there are no rules here, we're just trying to accomplish something"
                                                        Thomas Edison
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list