From: Dale <dalek@exceedtech.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there and Alternative to compiling kde?
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:50:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <439A0A19.2010700@exceedtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512092335.43311@frappe.xs4all.nl>
Gerhard Hoogterp wrote:
>While this is true and one of the things that makes gentoo gentoo, there are
>already binary packages in portage. mozilla-bin, openoffice-bin. Mostly big
>packages which take some time to compile. So the idea of having a
>pre-compiled KDE isn't that alien to the world of gentoo..
>
>Gerhard
>
>
And to think I still compile Open Office. I even compiled it on a
400Mhz rig once. Does anyone type in a command then take a nap? I'm
disabled and do get some rest but I do wake up on occasion. LOL
Gentoo is for those who want to compile from source. Having the option
for binaries may be OK, but I doubt there is enough people going to use
it for all the effort. Somebody has to still wait on it to finish
compiling.
Dale
:-)
--
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.
I have four rigs:
1: Home built; Abit NF7 ver 2.0 w/ AMD 2500+ CPU, 1GB of ram and right now two 80GB hard drives.
2: Home built; Iwill KK266-R w/ AMD 1GHz CPU, 256MBs of ram and a 4GB drive.
3: Home built; Gigabyte GA-71XE4 w/ 800MHz CPU, 128MBs of ram and a 2.5GB drive.
4: Compaq Proliant 6000 Server w/ Quad 200MHz CPUs, 128MBs of ram and a 4.3GB SCSI drive.
All run Gentoo, all run folding. #1 is my desktop, 2, 3, and 4 are set up as servers.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-09 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-09 21:55 [gentoo-user] Is there and Alternative to compiling kde? Harry Putnam
2005-12-09 22:08 ` Jeff
2005-12-09 22:20 ` Tom Smith
2005-12-09 22:35 ` Gerhard Hoogterp
2005-12-09 22:50 ` Dale [this message]
2005-12-09 22:58 ` Tom Smith
2005-12-10 0:22 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 2:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 10:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 13:52 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 1:39 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 10:58 ` [gentoo-user] " Holly Bostick
2005-12-10 14:59 ` Gerhard Hoogterp
2005-12-10 15:44 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-09 23:02 ` Chris White
2005-12-10 0:42 ` Dale
2005-12-10 1:46 ` [gentoo-user] " Daniel da Veiga
2005-12-10 1:59 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-14 3:07 ` Daevid Vincent
2005-12-14 6:14 ` Steven Susbauer
2005-12-14 6:20 ` Richard Fish
2005-12-14 20:42 ` Christoph Eckert
2005-12-14 9:43 ` Holly Bostick
2005-12-14 10:40 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 1:37 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 1:47 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 8:17 ` Chris White
2005-12-10 13:49 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 15:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 16:31 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 16:49 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2005-12-10 17:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 17:56 ` [gentoo-user] " Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=439A0A19.2010700@exceedtech.net \
--to=dalek@exceedtech.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox