From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-166603-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2371D139894
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:47:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACA53E0904;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:47:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.5])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77118E08CA
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:47:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet)
	by smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
	id 1ZTs68-0008zA-Et
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:47:40 +0000
From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:47:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4394467.brHiqe3HPR@wstn>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <55DB0A2C.4050506@gentoo.org>
References: <55C7ED31.8040003@gmail.com> <2043183.hIIsm6YyLf@wstn> <55DB0A2C.4050506@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [82.69.80.10]
X-Archives-Salt: ae82b758-460c-4502-a52c-23febf4ea20e
X-Archives-Hash: dc3b57b459770cd305fe209744f681c8

On Monday 24 August 2015 08:12:28 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 08:08 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Is syncing not yet sorted out? A fortnight later I'm still getting
> > something like 24000 manifests synced every day, and about a week ago I
> > got all the change-logs too.
> 
> That was expected... one more time. Hopefully it shouldn't happen again.

Which, the change-logs or the manifests?

I can't help thinking that all those - billions? - of little files being 
transferred every day must be slugging the net somewhat.

-- 
Rgds
Peter