public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kashani <kashani-list@badapple.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: default stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:20:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43821DEC.10805@badapple.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511211413.14160.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>

Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> well, it was made, because the idiots are too dumb to read and follow the 
> stage1 instructions.
> 
> And gentoo needs more idiots, right?
> 
> Up until now, the installation was a nice filter - but that has weakend now, 
> too.

	The last top posting/html thread was 3 weeks ago... so yes it's time 
for another "Keep Gentoo leet" thread. Gentoo isn't about pain, it's 
about getting work done. Anything, and I mean *anything*, that allows me 
to spend less time working and more time having a life is a good thing. 
Therefore we can deduce that anyone who wants a harder install is a 
hobbyist, dilettante, and a dabbler.

Which is a conclusion just as logical as easier installs bring idiots.

	I so am tired of this argument that I'm not even going to call anyone a 
chowderhead this time around. Look at the history/life cycle of any 
industry or technology. Gentoo is on track to leave the Innovation 
phase, assuming a few tech problems get fully worked out, and enter the 
Early Adopter phase. Or maybe the Early Majority phase... you could 
probably make a case for either.

http://marketingsage.net/W2W_Market_Stages.htm

	Yeah it's marketing speak which doesn't exactly match a project like 
Gentoo so well, but it's close enough. So rather than keeping out idiots 
we're keeping out the "Early Adopters adopt new ideas early, but 
carefully. They seek breakthrough advantages. They can be respected 
opinion leaders. They will invest in creating a complete solution so 
they may need lots of support." Translate that into "they're willing to 
deal with crappy processes to get the advantages and work to improve the 
shortcomings."

	I'll take that sort of idiot any day of the week.

kashani
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-21 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-21 12:33 default stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?) Steve B
2005-11-21 12:57 ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-21 13:09   ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-21 12:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-21 13:13 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2005-11-21 15:17   ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-21 18:19     ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-21 22:33       ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-21 23:36         ` Anthony Roy
2005-11-22  7:49         ` Philip Webb
2005-11-22  9:24         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22 11:22           ` Robin
2005-11-22 14:07             ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-22 17:24           ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 23:19             ` William Kenworthy
2005-11-23  0:11               ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 23:34             ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22  0:09     ` George Garvey
2005-11-22  0:17       ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22  0:40       ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-22  2:06         ` W.Kenworthy
2005-11-22 11:32         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-21 19:20   ` kashani [this message]
2005-11-21 20:39     ` John J. Foster
2005-11-21 20:47       ` Jason Dodson
2005-11-21 21:38         ` kashani
2005-11-21 22:10           ` Steven Susbauer
2005-11-21 22:27             ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 18:26     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2005-11-22 18:44       ` Nagatoro
2005-11-22 20:34         ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-22 19:52       ` Billy Holmes
2005-11-22 21:44       ` kashani
2005-11-21 20:15   ` [gentoo-user] Re: default stage3 Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-21 20:50     ` Bob Young
2005-11-21 22:01       ` Ryan Sims
2005-11-21 23:28         ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-22  9:17           ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22 17:03             ` Richard Fish
2005-11-22 18:03             ` Matthias Langer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43821DEC.10805@badapple.net \
    --to=kashani-list@badapple.net \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox