public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Holly Bostick <motub@planet.nl>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: default stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:17:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4381E519.7090900@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511211413.14160.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>

Hemmann, Volker Armin schreef:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 13:33, Steve B wrote:
> 
>> WTF.. I'm getting ready to rebuild my gentoo box. I have always did
>>  a stage 1 install. i was under the impression that if u used a 
>> stage 3 u couldn't muck with your CFLAGS or what not. If I'm forced
>>  to use canned binaries I might as well go with FC or Debian.. I've
>>  never listened to the "Gentoo is dead" comments.. but now who 
>> knows.. this is just crazy.. who came up with this stupid idea? 
>> from the sounds of it certianly not the Gentoo Community!
>> 
> 
> 
> well, it was made, because the idiots are too dumb to read and follow
>  the stage1 instructions.
> 
> And gentoo needs more idiots, right?
> 
> Up until now, the installation was a nice filter - but that has 
> weakend now, too.

 I don't actually agree... the impression I'm getting is that Gentoo has
now matured/evolved into a state where filters are no longer necessary
(or as necessary as previously).

Before now, the Gentoo install was rather fragmented, because all the
tools necessary to install Gentoo did not all work, or did not all work
as well as they needed to, or did not all work as well as they needed to
in combination with each other. In practical market terms, you wouldn't
want just everybody installing it-- in order to ensure a good and
successful experience for the largest number of people, you would not
want to encourage those who were untrained or refused training, since
the state of the backend required training for successful use. Those who
were turned off by the amount or complexity of the documentation (and/or
the length of time the install entailed) would tend naturally to fall away.

But once Gentoo is actually installed, it's just as easy to use as
anything else. Maybe you have to learn "emerge -whatever" instead of
"apt-get whatever", but one is not particularly "harder" than the other.
It was always the install that was hard, not the usage.

The evolution/maturation of Gentoo and its associated tools means that
in order to install Gentoo you no longer have to carefully pick your way
across a minefield (stage 1), but can with confidence stride across a
beautiful grassy plain (stage 3). If you then want to turn around and
"customize" that field-- plant some flowers, for example-- you can do
that (emerge -e world), or you don't have to. But the point is that if
you want to interrupt your journey to whatever was on the other side of
that field (use your PC for whatever you planned to do with the system,
instead of suffering to install the system in the first place) you now
have a choice about whether to do that or not. You are not essentially
forced to do so by the fact that the minefield was not clear and passage
to the other side was not easy or safe and required a great deal of
attention.

Unbelievable that people are complaining about an improvement in
ease-of-use (or in this case, installation). I'd also wonder why Steve
B. is installing (again) anyway; one of Gentoo's hallmarks is that you
basically install it once and you (almost) never have to do it again.

That is of course Steve's business..... although if he's going to
reinstall, again I must wonder why he would complain that such a
reinstall is now likely to be much easier, and lead to a functioning
system (from which he can emerge -e world to his heart's content) much
faster.

But maybe I just have a strange point of view.

Holly



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-21 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-21 12:33 default stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?) Steve B
2005-11-21 12:57 ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-21 13:09   ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-21 12:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-21 13:13 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2005-11-21 15:17   ` Holly Bostick [this message]
2005-11-21 18:19     ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-21 22:33       ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-21 23:36         ` Anthony Roy
2005-11-22  7:49         ` Philip Webb
2005-11-22  9:24         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22 11:22           ` Robin
2005-11-22 14:07             ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-22 17:24           ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 23:19             ` William Kenworthy
2005-11-23  0:11               ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 23:34             ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22  0:09     ` George Garvey
2005-11-22  0:17       ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22  0:40       ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-22  2:06         ` W.Kenworthy
2005-11-22 11:32         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-21 19:20   ` kashani
2005-11-21 20:39     ` John J. Foster
2005-11-21 20:47       ` Jason Dodson
2005-11-21 21:38         ` kashani
2005-11-21 22:10           ` Steven Susbauer
2005-11-21 22:27             ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 18:26     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2005-11-22 18:44       ` Nagatoro
2005-11-22 20:34         ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-22 19:52       ` Billy Holmes
2005-11-22 21:44       ` kashani
2005-11-21 20:15   ` [gentoo-user] Re: default stage3 Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-21 20:50     ` Bob Young
2005-11-21 22:01       ` Ryan Sims
2005-11-21 23:28         ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-22  9:17           ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22 17:03             ` Richard Fish
2005-11-22 18:03             ` Matthias Langer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4381E519.7090900@planet.nl \
    --to=motub@planet.nl \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox