From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdtfM-0006I1-SJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:11:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAKIAwbT017949; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:10:58 GMT Received: from popmail.jettissystems.com (popmail.jettissystems.com [38.118.146.212]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAKI78os000121 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:07:08 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [69.17.21.212]) by popmail.jettissystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89AE56D484 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:07:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4380BB4B.7040208@badapple.net> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:07:07 -0600 From: kashani User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] root password gremlin References: <20051117203328.73680.qmail@web25601.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <437EC8BB.2040507@mid.email-server.info> <437F4072.70604@buanzo.com.ar> <200511192320.24536.abhay.ilugd@gmail.com> <437FC7ED.9060504@buanzo.com.ar> <43805ED5.5020502@mid.email-server.info> <438061FE.4040004@buanzo.com.ar> <438071FE.50009@mid.email-server.info> <43807355.5050104@buanzo.com.ar> <43807691.40009@mid.email-server.info> <4380796C.90409@buanzo.com.ar> <43807E2F.1040802@planet.nl> <43807FEC.3010709@buanzo.com.ar> <438089F1.8020302@planet.nl> <43808BC9.2000209@buanzo.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <43808BC9.2000209@buanzo.com.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b20633a9-548c-4648-a9cd-28a40e855f77 X-Archives-Hash: 0481aa00934de659dd165a852d9ffe68 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Holly Bostick wrote: >>Why should I-- who has further had (very) bad >>experiences with the use of PAM, give it another try, when my system >>clearly runs without it, which suggests I have no need for it? > > I'd like to know why. I'm very interested in what your problems were, really. Do a search on the forums for problems with pam. Read the resulting fifty odd threads. kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list