From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edql0-0006ib-U6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:05:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAKF4LT6016781; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:04:21 GMT Received: from mx2.wholenet.com.ar (mx2.wholenet.com.ar [200.80.32.172]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAKExOoY023780 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:59:24 GMT Received: from [10.10.0.2] ([200.114.220.88]) (AUTH: LOGIN buanzo) by mx2.wholenet.com.ar with esmtp; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:59:22 -0300 id 000B3B23.43808F4A.0000579B Message-ID: <43808F43.6050703@buanzo.com.ar> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:59:15 -0300 From: "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" Organization: The WholeNet User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] regarding PAM [WAS: root password gremlin] References: <20051117203328.73680.qmail@web25601.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <437EC8BB.2040507@mid.email-server.info> <437F4072.70604@buanzo.com.ar> <200511192320.24536.abhay.ilugd@gmail.com> <437FC7ED.9060504@buanzo.com.ar> <43805ED5.5020502@mid.email-server.info> <438061FE.4040004@buanzo.com.ar> <438071FE.50009@mid.email-server.info> <4380737B.5070906@buanzo.com.ar> <438076C7.7070103@mid.email-server.info> <43807912.8030209@buanzo.com.ar> <43807C5C.3040204@mid.email-server.info> <43807EF4.9070803@buanzo.com.ar> <43808D73.7040403@mid.email-server.info> In-Reply-To: <43808D73.7040403@mid.email-server.info> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 61b142a0-bda0-4b93-ba9b-c9e040c50c45 X-Archives-Hash: 75e659e9710aa6c67ec94892c6ea7e16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Skwar wrote: > Also on normally sized systems, there just is no > requirement for it - as long as the requirements > are simple enough (eg. LDAP? Go PAM! Database? Go > PAM!). But on consumer systems, and that's what > we're talking about!, you won't need PAM. Not > now, not in the future. Let's settle this here, then. We've both provided enough arguments, both pro and against our points of view :) Nice discussion, anyway! - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica / Dominio Digital TV - Da FOSS man! KTP Consultores - info AT ktpconsultores.com.ar Romper un sistema de seguridad los acerca tanto a ser hackers como el encender autos puenteando los convierte en ingenieros automotrices. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDgI9DAlpOsGhXcE0RAkNtAJ41K7mlxQcJ3QDxE/zNwM1LqfuergCeKl4Y 6ZPV6ZtTIP2H45O2NViiyzs= =b1R6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list