From: kashani <kashani-list@badapple.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:24:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437BBFA2.8070004@badapple.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9999810b0511161320n3fe64e46ye99a5dbad81128db@mail.gmail.com>
Derek Tracy wrote:
> I also want to reiterate that if they are going to make a Stage3 install
> the default then make it a rock solid release. And in my opinion
> portage needs to be pruned not only of un-maintained packages but also
> of packages that conflict with others.
>
> Like I said before a Stable tree should be just that Stable. There is
> no reason someone should have to completely change to the Unstable
> branch when all of the programs that he / she wants are marked stable
> for that arch.
My understanding is that you're way more likely to have issues starting
from a stage1, I know I have. Moving general users to stage3 is an
attempt to eliminate variables and streamline the testing that goes into
a release. By streamlining the testing you can increase the actual
amount of testing you can do without increasing the overhead.
kashani
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-19 15:07 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:26 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 7:44 ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 3:03 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 9:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 14:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 0:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17 0:34 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:59 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24 ` kashani [this message]
2005-11-16 21:33 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54 ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:37 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:21 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437BBFA2.8070004@badapple.net \
--to=kashani-list@badapple.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox