public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kashani <kashani-list@badapple.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:24:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <437BBFA2.8070004@badapple.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9999810b0511161320n3fe64e46ye99a5dbad81128db@mail.gmail.com>

Derek Tracy wrote:
> I also want to reiterate that if they are going to make a Stage3 install 
> the default then make it a rock solid release.  And in my opinion 
> portage needs to be pruned not only of un-maintained packages but also 
> of packages that conflict with others. 
> 
> Like I said before a Stable tree should be just that Stable.  There is 
> no reason someone should have to completely change to the Unstable 
> branch when all of the programs that he / she wants are marked stable 
> for that arch.

	My understanding is that you're way more likely to have issues starting 
from a stage1, I know I have. Moving general users to stage3 is an 
attempt to eliminate variables and streamline the testing that goes into 
a release. By streamlining the testing you can increase the actual 
amount of testing you can do without increasing the overhead.

kashani
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-16 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-19 15:07   ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50   ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50     ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32       ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17  0:26         ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24       ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59         ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17  7:44   ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17  3:03       ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17  9:23         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52           ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 14:35             ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44               ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21           ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17  0:17     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17  0:34       ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30   ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04     ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30   ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47     ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55       ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:59         ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10         ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20           ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31             ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24             ` kashani [this message]
2005-11-16 21:33           ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53         ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54   ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:37   ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17  0:21     ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=437BBFA2.8070004@badapple.net \
    --to=kashani-list@badapple.net \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox