From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EZjlv-0000lU-GM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 06:49:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA96mWNW029730; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:48:32 GMT Received: from mirus.exceedtech.net (ftp.crawdat.com [65.116.46.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA96ihEu024383 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:44:44 GMT Received: from [209.205.160.98] (nosp1-209-205-160-98.i-55.com [209.205.160.98]) by mirus.exceedtech.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA96ukV1026843 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:56:47 -0600 Message-ID: <43719AD8.20705@exceedtech.net> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:44:40 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Screen is being a CPU hog, big time!!! References: <4370A087.9050609@exceedtech.net> <4370A357.6020708@exceedtech.net> <4370FDFF.2010800@exceedtech.net> <20051108221320.GA31410@princeton.edu> <43714217.6010201@exceedtech.net> <20051109021837.GA20186@princeton.edu> <437175F5.2080902@exceedtech.net> <20051109062510.GB24217@princeton.edu> In-Reply-To: <20051109062510.GB24217@princeton.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 327863c5-dbdc-40a6-9ff7-9de4ddc7a485 X-Archives-Hash: dbf856844089718555f75f7479cce0e9 Willie Wong wrote: > >Oh... the protein folding thing. Since you run it in screen, I assume >you are running the text-mode client? Just out of curiousity, on the >two boxes you have, did you run the same version of the client? > >I just downloaded the stable version (FAH502-Linux.exe) and have been >running it in screen for the last hour or so. So far I cannot see the >same behaviour you are describing. One thing I noticed, for some >reason the one I am running is loading FahCore_82, while yours load >78.... > >Anyway, did you install foldingathome through portage? What is the >command you are using to start the process? > >Try downloading the client directly from the Stanford website, put it >in a new directory, cd to that directory, and issue > screen ./FAH502-Linux.exe >and see if the problem persists. > >W > > Well I used finstall. The reason I did that is because of my quad CPU Compaq server. With finstall, it handles all 4 CPUs and the same time and with one command to start or stop. It is a really nice way to do it. I like consistancy so I installed it on all my rigs. I also fell in love with the screen thing as well. Funny huh? LOL I posted a thread on the folding forums. If no one replies before to long, I'm going to delete and start over with a fresh install. Maybe I got a bug or something. Knowing me, I just screwed up something. LOL It happens, especially with me. :( The best thing that has happened to me in a very long time is finding my new lady, after 15 years of looking I might add. Thanks Dale :-) -- To err is human, I'm most certainly human. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list