From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EYtJL-0002t4-1s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:48:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA6Ml03X013660; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:47:00 GMT Received: from mirus.exceedtech.net (ftp.crawdat.com [65.116.46.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA6MgFRg004677 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:42:16 GMT Received: from [209.205.159.206] (nosp2-209-205-159-206.i-55.com [209.205.159.206]) by mirus.exceedtech.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA6MruV1014117 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:53:57 -0600 Message-ID: <436E86C3.9090807@exceedtech.net> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:42:11 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not??? References: <436E2268.5060206@gmx.net> <20051107093925.6412.NICK@rout.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <20051107093925.6412.NICK@rout.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1346cef9-4b9c-4c81-a9a9-5e225ea77b2b X-Archives-Hash: 455fdf7b354bda3e9154228fc2faee0a Nick Rout wrote: >To everyone in this thread: it would probably help if you specified >which version of portage you are running! > > >On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:34:00 +0100 >Jarry wrote: > > > >>Hi, >> >>there was a thread concerning portage/emerge being recently fixed >>and faster now (sorry, forgot original subject). Well, I was really >>impressed by that improvement, until today: >> >>"emerge --sync" takes again very long time, nearly freezing at 51% >>of "updating portage cache", cpu load is on 99% load, 25 minutes and >>I'm still waiting. And 2 days ago the whole "emerge --sync" took >>about 3-4 minutes! Anyone else having the same experience? >> >>Jarry >>-- >>gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list >> >> > > > > root@smoker / # emerge --version > Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/x86/2005.0, gcc-3.3.6, > glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 i686) > root@smoker / # That help any? Dale :-) -- To err is human, I'm most certainly human. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list