From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EYmua-0004c6-8J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:58:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA6FvXK4013244; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:57:33 GMT Received: from mirus.exceedtech.net (ftp.crawdat.com [65.116.46.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA6FqpQR005372 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:52:52 GMT Received: from [209.205.160.68] (nosp1-209-205-160-68.i-55.com [209.205.160.68]) by mirus.exceedtech.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA6G4CV1027288 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:04:22 -0600 Message-ID: <436E26B1.7090408@exceedtech.net> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:52:17 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not??? References: <436E2268.5060206@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <436E2268.5060206@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5696e085-0d3b-43b6-97f4-5dd32f94814b X-Archives-Hash: cf870e6ef12a8c5f7ba7f78c085337fc Jarry wrote: >Hi, > >there was a thread concerning portage/emerge being recently fixed >and faster now (sorry, forgot original subject). Well, I was really >impressed by that improvement, until today: > >"emerge --sync" takes again very long time, nearly freezing at 51% >of "updating portage cache", cpu load is on 99% load, 25 minutes and >I'm still waiting. And 2 days ago the whole "emerge --sync" took >about 3-4 minutes! Anyone else having the same experience? > >Jarry > > Same here just a bit ago. I did not use the du -s thing though. It stayed around 50% for a while. What happened? Anybody know? Dale -- To err is human, I'm most certainly human. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list