[gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Zhang Weiwu]

After successfully merged, it goes like this:

zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
        Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
        OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
http://go-oo.org ]

looks to me this file libuno_sal.so.3 does exist on another machine
OpenOffice installation where it is installed by the 1.9 installer,
under programs folder.

Looks like a very obvious problem, why seems no discussion about it? Is
it just me who have this problem?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Ryan L]

Zhang Weiwu wrote:

>After successfully merged, it goes like this:
>
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
>/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
>libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>or directory
>/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
>libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>or directory
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
>dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
>        Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
>app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
>        OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
>http://go-oo.org ]
>
>looks to me this file libuno_sal.so.3 does exist on another machine
>OpenOffice installation where it is installed by the 1.9 installer,
>under programs folder.
>
>Looks like a very obvious problem, why seems no discussion about it? Is
>it just me who have this problem?
>  
>

Not sure if mine is related, but when running revdep-rebuild it gives me 
a LOT of errors about openoffice needing some libraries and then 
remerges OO2.0. All fine and dandy, but running revdep-rebuild again 
afterward gives the same thing. I've done this about 4 times in a row. 
Perhaps OO2.0 isn't handling its libraries correctly. Or maybe an ebuild 
error?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[赵光]

2005/11/4, Ryan L <drseus88@gmail.com>:
> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>
are you chinese,if you are chinese ,please give firefly OOo2 a try,
i think it will work well for you.

--
/****************************************
* Love in Gentoo-Linux  C and Python           *
* Look at my blog                                          *
* http://poorc.wordpress.com                       *
****************************************/

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Richard Fish]

Zhang Weiwu wrote:

>After successfully merged, it goes like this:
>
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
>/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
>libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>or directory
>/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
>libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>or directory
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
>dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
>        Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
>zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
>app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
>        OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
>http://go-oo.org ]
>  
>

Did you emerge the bin, or build from sources?  I emerged openoffice 
with "-java", so I don't have any javaldx as part of my openoffice 
installation.  But I do have libvcl680li.so, and libuno_sal.so:

carcharias program # ls -l libuno_sal.* libvcl680li.so
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      15 Nov  2 14:28 libuno_sal.so -> 
libuno_sal.so.3
-r--r--r--  1 root root 1814568 Oct 23 18:12 libuno_sal.so.3
-r--r--r--  1 root root 3402428 Oct 23 18:12 libvcl680li.so
carcharias program # pwd
/usr/lib/openoffice/program
carcharias program # emerge -Dv --pretend openoffice

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl -eds -gnome +gtk 
-java +kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Richard Fish]

Ryan L wrote:

> Not sure if mine is related, but when running revdep-rebuild it gives 
> me a LOT of errors about openoffice needing some libraries and then 
> remerges OO2.0. All fine and dandy, but running revdep-rebuild again 
> afterward gives the same thing. I've done this about 4 times in a row. 
> Perhaps OO2.0 isn't handling its libraries correctly. Or maybe an 
> ebuild error?


If you have emerged the binary package, this is normal, because the 
binary version sticks private versions of all libraries and even python 
in the openoffice directory, where it can't be found without setting 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment.  If you did merge the binary, update 
/etc/make.conf to set SEARCH_DIRS_MASK="/usr/lib/openoffice".

-Richard
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Ryan L]

Richard Fish wrote:

> Ryan L wrote:
>
>> Not sure if mine is related, but when running revdep-rebuild it gives 
>> me a LOT of errors about openoffice needing some libraries and then 
>> remerges OO2.0. All fine and dandy, but running revdep-rebuild again 
>> afterward gives the same thing. I've done this about 4 times in a 
>> row. Perhaps OO2.0 isn't handling its libraries correctly. Or maybe 
>> an ebuild error?
>
>
>
> If you have emerged the binary package, this is normal, because the 
> binary version sticks private versions of all libraries and even 
> python in the openoffice directory, where it can't be found without 
> setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment.  If you did merge the 
> binary, update /etc/make.conf to set 
> SEARCH_DIRS_MASK="/usr/lib/openoffice".
>
> -Richard

Thank you sir! Worked like a charm! I just had to use lib32 instead of 
lib since I'm on amd64, but still worked perfectly! Thanks!

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Zhang Weiwu]

Richard Fish wrote:

> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>
>> After successfully merged, it goes like this:
>>
>> zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ oowriter2
>> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared
>> libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared
>> libraries: libvcl680li.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libuno_sal.so
>> zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ locate libvcl680li.so
>> zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I blackdown-jre
>> dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 *
>>        Blackdown Java Runtime Environment  [ http://www.blackdown.org ]
>> zhangweiwu@Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program $ qpkg -i -I openoffice
>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 *
>>        OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite. [
>> http://go-oo.org ]
>>  
>>
>
> Did you emerge the bin, or build from sources?

It took me one day to emerge from source. I tried SEARCH_DIRS_MASK but
that doesn't work for me.

>   I emerged openoffice with "-java", so I don't have any javaldx as
> part of my openoffice installation.  But I do have libvcl680li.so, and
> libuno_sal.so:
>
> carcharias program # ls -l libuno_sal.* libvcl680li.so
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      15 Nov  2 14:28 libuno_sal.so ->
> libuno_sal.so.3
> -r--r--r--  1 root root 1814568 Oct 23 18:12 libuno_sal.so.3
> -r--r--r--  1 root root 3402428 Oct 23 18:12 libvcl680li.so
> carcharias program # pwd
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program
> carcharias program # emerge -Dv --pretend openoffice
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl -eds -gnome +gtk
> -java +kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
>
> -Richard
>
More helpful debug message:

Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program # ls -l libuno* libvcl*
ls: libvcl*: No such file or directory.
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 26 11月  1 23:52 libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so ->
libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 16 11月  1 23:52 libuno_cppu.so -> libuno_cppu.so.3

Joe /usr/lib/openoffice/program # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -Dv
--pretend openoffice

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +gtk
+java -kde +ldap +mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB

Total size of downloads: 0 kB

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Richard Fish]

Zhang Weiwu wrote:

>It took me one day to emerge from source. I tried SEARCH_DIRS_MASK but
>that doesn't work for me.
>  
>

Yes, the SEARCH_DIRS_MASK is only for revdep-rebuild and for those who 
merged the binary package.  You do not need it when merging from source, 
and has no effect on your ability to start OOo.

>These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
>Calculating dependencies ...done!
>[ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +gtk
>+java -kde +ldap +mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
>  
>

Well, these USE flags are quite different than what I use, so comparing 
to my system is probably not useful.

But, could you try an "equery check openoffice", and see if it reports 
any problems?

I remember that when I compiled OOo2, it took over 3Gb of space in /var, 
and my /usr/lib/openoffice directory is using 228M.  Maybe you ran out 
of disk space at some point during the merge, which is why you are 
missing files???

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Zhang Weiwu]

Richard Fish wrote:

> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>
>> It took me one day to emerge from source. I tried SEARCH_DIRS_MASK but
>> that doesn't work for me.
>>  
>>
>
> Yes, the SEARCH_DIRS_MASK is only for revdep-rebuild and for those who
> merged the binary package.  You do not need it when merging from
> source, and has no effect on your ability to start OOo.
>
>> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies ...done!
>> [ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +gtk
>> +java -kde +ldap +mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
>>  
>>
>
> Well, these USE flags are quite different than what I use, so
> comparing to my system is probably not useful.
>
> But, could you try an "equery check openoffice", and see if it reports
> any problems?
>
> I remember that when I compiled OOo2, it took over 3Gb of space in
> /var, and my /usr/lib/openoffice directory is using 228M.  Maybe you
> ran out of disk space at some point during the merge, which is why you
> are missing files???
>
> -Richard
>
I don't understand: if it run out of space, how comes the package marked
as installed. I have about 3.8G free hdd space though.
zhangweiwu@Joe ~ $ equery check openoffice
[ Checking app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 ]
 * 880 out of 880 files good

I think I can try compile with your USE flags later.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Is it just me? Or everyone has this openoffice2 problem?

[Richard Fish]

Zhang Weiwu wrote:

>Richard Fish wrote:
>  
>
>>Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>>>
>>>Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>>[ebuild   R   ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +gtk
>>>+java -kde +ldap +mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 0 kB
>>>      
>>>
>>Well, these USE flags are quite different than what I use, so
>>comparing to my system is probably not useful.
>>
>>But, could you try an "equery check openoffice", and see if it reports
>>any problems?
>>
>>I remember that when I compiled OOo2, it took over 3Gb of space in
>>/var, and my /usr/lib/openoffice directory is using 228M.  Maybe you
>>ran out of disk space at some point during the merge, which is why you
>>are missing files???
>>
>>-Richard
>>    
>>
>I don't understand: if it run out of space, how comes the package marked
>as installed. I have about 3.8G free hdd space though.
>  
>

Well, it should have failed...but it is the only explanation I can think 
of that would account for why you are missing libraries, other than 
filesystem corruption and the libraries being moved to lost+found.  My 
guess is 3.8G is close to being enough, but not quite, because you must 
have room for the compiled sources plus an install template (~225M), 
plus the installed files (~225M).  Also, I don't have an exact figure on 
the amount of space necessary to build OOo, since I wasn't paying very 
close attention, but I do know that it was well over 3G.

>zhangweiwu@Joe ~ $ equery check openoffice
>[ Checking app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 ]
> * 880 out of 880 files good
>  
>

Hmm, I think there is something bad here.  My check of openoffice shows 
2674 files.  I doubt such a huge difference can be attributed to USE flags.

>I think I can try compile with your USE flags later.
>  
>

Unless you want to merge large parts of KDE as well, I wouldn't! ;-)

But you might try to free up some space and build again.  Deleting old 
distfiles is usually enough to free up a gigabyte or so.  Also, remember 
that with ext3, running out of inodes is just as bad as running out of 
space, so if you use ext3, you might want to make sure you have plenty 
available with "dumpe2fs -h | grep 'Free inodes'".  The sources are 
nearly 100000 files, so I would say that 150000 available inodes should 
be sufficient for an OOo build.

Of course, you could also just merge the -bin and be done with it. :-)

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list