From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EU7iq-0000J6-06 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:11:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9OJATE7003850; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:10:29 GMT Received: from redweb.harvee.org (dsl093-191-107.nyc2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.191.107]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9OJ6T8Z024593 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:06:29 GMT Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by redweb.harvee.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ABD76D46 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from harvee.harvee.org (harvee-xeno.harvee.org [192.168.25.100]) by redweb.harvee.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D0F76D46 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.30] (unknown [192.168.0.30]) by harvee.harvee.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2D03DE30 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <435D30B2.4020906@harvee.org> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 From: "Eric S. Johansson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Windows/20051006) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Camram: capability; stamp X-Archives-Salt: cc5de16c-b3d1-4c4c-b4bb-8b0232ec0b7b X-Archives-Hash: 7e79fb25d22f347da20cd769ad5223e3 updated a couple of machines to 2005.1+ sometime in the past month. Everything went fine or so I thought. Had to reboot one of the machines today. It wouldn't boot. Everything started okay or so it seemed except eth0 wasn't present. The module was compiled in the kernel, the configuration was the same as it had been for a long time. The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did something go wrong in the emerge process? There's no sign of any attackers. ideas? --- eric -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list