From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ERshT-0003wY-NI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:44:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9IEfAcY029374; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:41:10 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9IEaPER030601 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:36:26 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2005 14:38:39 -0000 Received: from 84-72-130-34.dclient.hispeed.ch (EHLO [127.0.0.1]) [84.72.130.34] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 18 Oct 2005 16:38:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1076219 Message-ID: <435508EC.1010502@gmx.ch> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:38:36 +0200 From: Christoph Gysin <cgysin@gmx.ch> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] codec h264 References: <200510181014.30054.uwix@iway.na> <4354D896.6090001@gmx.ch> <200510181415.31318.uwix@iway.na> In-Reply-To: <200510181415.31318.uwix@iway.na> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 4f59cd03-8357-4042-bc8e-e41a99f65754 X-Archives-Hash: 92765dd7a9fa5cd8375eff8117c124d4 Uwe Thiem wrote: > Thanks! I'll have a look but guess "early development" isn't good enough yet. I'd still give it a shot. Most of the time the software is more stable than the developers would admit. > I asked because we encoded a 1h45m movie with h264 on an mac with surprising > results. The whole movie in full PAL quality shrunk to about 500MB!!!! The > encoding took 5 hours on a dual G5, though. Sounds interesting! Christoph -- echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" org@fr33z3 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list