From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EJaOZ-0004ry-2i
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:34:35 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8PHPwvC005688;
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:25:58 GMT
Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8PHKexE002234
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:20:45 GMT
Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([85.224.245.192] [85.224.245.192])
by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP
id <20050925172723.EKTQ11792.mxfep02.bredband.com@[192.168.0.103]>
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:27:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4336DDFA.2080207@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:27:22 +0200
From: Nagatoro <nagatoro@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050908)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot merge mozilla or mozilla-firefox
References: <43357E2C.4000501@fire-eyes.org> <20050925070448.GB21785@waltdnes.org> <4336CBAB.5090707@gmail.com> <20050925170717.GA22710@waltdnes.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050925170717.GA22710@waltdnes.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4c7aea61-39f1-4d90-b628-261ff74b6fe0
X-Archives-Hash: ace19c433384777bda021f853ad7b940
Walter Dnes wrote:
> I can make mistakes, and this looks like one. My corrected
> interpretation is that accepting *ALL* ~X86 is a problem.
Not a problem per say, but it will make you use packages that are
flagged for ebuild testing (the package *should* be stable but the
ebuild might not be). Hence you might run into some nasty bugs but they
should be quite unfrequent.
> If someone
> needs a couple of ~X86 packages, package.unmask is the way to go.
>
Or rather package.keywords. package.unmask is for using packages that
are masked in package.mask.
--
Naga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list