From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ED7Wo-0002Vp-Pf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:32:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j87LOkGE020113; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 21:24:46 GMT Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk (mail.metronet.co.uk [213.162.97.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j87L5Sho030962 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 21:05:29 GMT Received: from hotmail.com (213-162-121-96.iancro892.adsl.metronet.co.uk [213.162.121.96]) by smtp.metronet.co.uk (MetroNet Mail) with ESMTP id BCB9B415937 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 22:07:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <431F56BD.60E8EEAC@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:08:13 +0100 From: Ian Clowes Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] issue on binary merge References: <4KeIy-2BA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <4KeIy-2BA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <4Kf1U-30Z-31@gated-at.bofh.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 35533550-535b-49cc-960c-f2812019cc4e X-Archives-Hash: 4391b9bd3e60de5318cc803f2711c62b Sascha Lucas wrote: > > emerge -1 --usepkg --pretend --verbose pkg_spec_from_equery > > then the change in USE-Flags are showen and my _correct_ binarys are used. > There's probably a good reason for it being the way it is, but it doesn't sound as transparent as we might like. A further interesting scenario might be to have a binary package available built with different USE flags to those on the target machine, and seeing if it gets installed or not. I guess it shouldn't. But then there's the CFLAGS issue as well, and I'm even more unsure how that's supposed to be handled. I'm still pretty new to Gentoo, but is this perhaps related to the feature I've read about (and maybe misremembered) regarding only packages that you explicity emerge going into world (dependencies don't)? I wonder if you'd see different results if you explicitly emerged cups rather than it having been implicity emerged due to a dependency. By doing the emerge you described you've 'promoted' those packages from implicit to explicit emerge. IanC -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list