From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7eKA-00010E-T4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:20:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7NJINXJ032582; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:18:23 GMT Received: from smtp17.wxs.nl (smtp17.wxs.nl [195.121.6.13]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7NJDa97015255 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:13:36 GMT Received: from [10.0.0.150] (ip3e83ab52.speed.planet.nl [62.131.171.82]) by smtp17.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ILO003MRW47UG@smtp17.wxs.nl> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:14:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:14:30 +0200 From: Holly Bostick Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] More splash problems In-reply-to: <92e835f9050823115074bab4fa@mail.gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <430B7596.1060009@planet.nl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050803) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 References: <430ADD7B.5040208@gmail.com> <430B39BF.8070803@planet.nl> <430B61F5.6080501@gmail.com> <92e835f9050823115074bab4fa@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 4beae9c0-fea3-4738-931f-a46a1ec052ba X-Archives-Hash: 8ba529fe05b0380cce3f36a063990c56 Matthias Krebs schreef: > And as > someone else mentioned before, vesafb-tng is not a valid kernel > parameter, so everything after it is ignored. In what world is this? If you're using vesafb-tng (added to the kernel options by the fbsplash patch which you get with the gentoo kernels, which is no surprise, given that it was created by spock, a gentoo developer), then it most certainly is a valid kernel parameter (and was selected in the kernel config output that was posted in a previous message. If the post you're referring to was Uwe's, I don't think he meant that the parameter was invalid, but rather that rather than using vesafb-tng, that the OP should try "regular" vesafb, which might work where vesafb-tng wasn't working. Oh, and btw, Nagatoro... it's silly, but just open up your grub.conf with nano and make sure that some word-wrap somewhere didn't mess up your kernel line. That happened to me a couple of times, and in that respect, Matthias is on to something: if the line wraps to another line (with some kind of soft return), and is not really all on one line as it is supposed to be, the second half of the kernel line (after the soft wrap) will be ignored. So opening up the file with nano and going to the beginning of any apparently wrapped line and hitting Backspace to pull it all together is not a bad idea. Holly -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list