Re: [gentoo-user] weird 1000baseT problem

[Mark Humphrey <markh@net-1.org>]

Uwe Thiem wrote:

>On 12 August 2005 04:13, Bob Sanders wrote:
>  
>
>>On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:40:12 +0100
>>
>>Uwe Thiem <uwix@iway.na> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I am puzzled. First I thought that the Gb NIC on box A is somehow kaput
>>>but case 1 surely shows it is performing. What the heck is going on here?
>>>I would be deeply indebted to any person on this list that could shed
>>>some light on this. Any hint what to investigate would be highly
>>>appreciated. Really. This has troubled me for the last three days and I
>>>would go as far as ship you a Windhoek Lager. ;-)
>>>      
>>>
It would probably cost 10 times the price of the lager for shipping.
Maybe you should make it a case? I heard that Namibia Breweries is due
to stop making Heineken and it's going to SAB? :-)

>>The long timeout before password is probably DNS not working the port
>>properly. Just a guess.
>>    
>>
>
>Nope. Same behaviour when using IP addresses.
>
>  
>
>>Have you tried - scp, in both directions?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, did it now. Surprisingly it transfers data at 2xB/s both ways. Quite 
>different from sftp.
>
>  
>
>>And which nfs?  V3, V4?  I suggest V4, if not.
>>    
>>
>
>V3 is what nfsstat says. Hmm. I've enabled both, V3 and V4, server- and 
>client-side. How do I force it to use V4?
>
>  
>
>>Have you run top and netstat -rn on both boxes to see what they think the
>>routing is?
>>    
>>
>
>Routes are alright. Both boxes have a route to the class C network 
>(192.168.254.0/24) they are using.
>
>Uwe
>
>  
>



Email Disclaimer
http://www.aplitec.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list