From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2VoJ-0007H4-SW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:14:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j79FDEg0028484; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:13:14 GMT Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j79F94aC017528 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:09:05 GMT Received: (qmail 52175 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 15:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.101?) (richard?j?fish@68.230.97.177 with plain) by smtp018.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 15:09:34 -0000 Message-ID: <42F8C735.8080801@asmallpond.org> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 08:09:41 -0700 From: Richard Fish User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050807) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which filesystem for a notebook? References: <42F7D154.7050106@mid.email-server.info> <200508090351.58660.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <42F821EF.6050400@asmallpond.org> <20050809090056.3f3ecf75@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20050809090056.3f3ecf75@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a42be1c1-1bd0-45ab-808b-6eb46f7c2152 X-Archives-Hash: 66b6c457f4a2538cb05e341c825cca27 Neil Bothwick wrote: >>Reiserfs V3: Excellent performance for _some_operations, slower >>performance for others. Also can only be grown. >> >> > >That's not correct. resize_reiserfs can shrink as well as grown, but the >filesystem must be unmounted. > > Thanks for the correction. I'm trying to figure out what I read that led me to believe reiserfs could not be shrunk.... -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list