From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dubnt-0002qX-JT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:01:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6IJxS5J013638; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:59:28 GMT Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6IJto9s023054 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:55:51 GMT Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so970624nzd for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tzze+9mmGyHYSFeX07XDMXEnYXODT7vtY7aReZdXBjk9GlSFPdS8v+8EU7ByBaM6km4M/L9CVqjnKSmS8V/0RuU29RljC51gtgTimuwEthKJ0iMLPBTPlhSQN91N7yFkoTL2DKzEp4Usi/3smiRnIzqnSpvFUra0G5zsOFdBvu8= Received: by 10.36.119.17 with SMTP id r17mr3738784nzc; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ([24.30.171.44]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm6681988nzo.2005.07.18.12.56.14; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42DC0991.70401@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:57:05 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libgsf weirdness... References: <200507180914.10940.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <42DBF342.3060909@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j6IJxS5b013638 X-Archives-Salt: 800264a8-f790-49a7-aec4-c332693a8fc5 X-Archives-Hash: af21e167f652240a1a5e5338e4db155a Tero Grundstr=F6m wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Zac Medico wrote: >=20 >> Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: >> >>> For past couple of weeks as I was doing emerge --sync and emerge=20 >>> -uDNp I've noticed that libgsf has "jumping" versions. That is one=20 >>> week it's 1.12.0 another 1.10.0 and it swings from one to another.=20 >>> Does anybody know what might trigger this behavior? >>> >> >> There's a portage bug that fits that description:=20 >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13632. When I encounter this= I=20 >> simply package mask the lower versions. >> >> mkdir /etc/portage >> echo "> /etc/portage/package.mask >=20 >=20 > That is not the correct way as this bug is caused by packages not=20 > functioning correctly with *newer* versions. In this case gnumeric=20 > doesn't like libgsf versions above 1.10. >=20 > If you think gnumeric does work well with the newest version of libgsf=20 > and that the package maintainer is setting wrongly the dependency=20 > version, please file a bug. >=20 Okay, my mistake. Actually, now that you mention it, it turns out that I= edited the ebuild myself to have RDEPEND=3D">=3Dgnome-extra/libgsf-1.10"= in my overlay. I'm not sure whether or not it causes negative consequen= ces but since I rarely (if ever) use gnumeric, I'm not presently concerne= d ;-). Zac --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list